Skip to main content

Questions tagged [operators]

In physics, an operator is almost always either a square matrix or a linear mapping between two function spaces (defined on, say, $\mathbb R^n$). Operators serve as observables and as time evolution operators in Quantum Mechanics. This tag will most often find valid use in quantum mechanics; don't use this tag just because your equations contain "everyday operations" like $\times$, $+$!

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
87 views

On Chapter 7 of Fetter & Walecka, the authors prove Dyson formula for the (imaginary time) propagator $U(t,t_{0}) = e^{H_{0}t_{0}}e^{-H(t_{0}-t)}e^{-H_{0}t}$, where I am ommitting the $\hbar$'s. ...
InMathweTrust's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
37 views

I am reading Vassili N. Kolokoltsov's paper arXiv:2505.14605, "On the Mathematical Theory of Quantum Stochastic Filtering Equations for Mixed States", and having trouble understanding the ...
Significant page's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
401 views

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner%27s_theorem For unitary case $$\langle U \Psi, U \Phi \rangle = \langle \Psi, \Phi \rangle .\tag{1} $$ If I apply the definition of adjoint https://...
orange's user avatar
  • 63
0 votes
0 answers
85 views

Suppose we compute an expectation value of $r_{12} r_{13}^{-1}$ over a wave function $\phi_p (1) \otimes \phi_q(2) \otimes \phi_r (3)$, we denote it as $$\langle pqr | r_{12} r_{13}^{-1} |pqr \rangle. ...
Attended's user avatar
6 votes
4 answers
593 views

I am a Math student, new at Quantum Mechanics, and I am having some troubles understanding the physical meaning of the notion of “complete set of compatible observables". I know its mathematical ...
Steppenwolf's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
90 views

This is from page 127 of Sakurai QM: How did they obtain this result? I understand the factor comes from the Hamilton on the LHS, but how were they able to pull out the factor out of the bra-ket like ...
ConquestAce's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
132 views

I understand that the commutator of field operators in a free field theory is always a $c$-number. Now I want to see whether a generalization to interacting fields is also possible? In the interacting ...
Frank's user avatar
  • 51
-1 votes
1 answer
81 views

Say we have the statement; An observable $A$ is a symmetry of the system if $[A,\hat H]=0$ where the Hamiltonian doesn't explicitly depend on time. We now know that $A\hat H = \hat H A$ does this ...
Selin Necatigil's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
251 views

I am trying to compute the Feynman rules for a theory with derivative coupling: $$ \mathscr{L}_{int} = e v^{\mu} (\partial_{\mu} \phi) \phi $$ where $\phi$ is a real, massive scalar field, and $v^{\mu}...
cameronpoe's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
170 views

In the Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures, the time evolution of an operator $A$ is defined differently. In the $\textbf{Heisenberg picture}:$ \begin{equation} A_H(t) = e^{i(H_0 + V)t} ...
seeker's user avatar
  • 288
4 votes
0 answers
77 views

In higher-spin CFT, operators organize themselves into additive multi-twist. I am a bit confused as to the use of "twist-two", "leading-twist", etc. Especially when it mentioned in ...
Jane Eriksson's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
69 views

I am wondering about the following statement which appears in Townsend's book on Quantum mechanics, expression (9.88), page 319. Let $|\psi \rangle$ be some energy eigenstate. Here, $\langle \mathbf{r}...
Aannddrreeww's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
302 views

Although this looks a very simple question, it has been difficult to find an answer on textbooks since many of them develop the theory of interacting many particles for zero temperature and just ...
MathMath's user avatar
  • 1,367
2 votes
0 answers
66 views

Consider a chiral quasi-primary field in 2D with conformal dimension $h$. Under conformal transformation it transforms as: $$\phi^{'}(z)=(\frac{df}{dz})^{h}\phi(f(z)).$$ For the two point function of ...
Mars's user avatar
  • 523
2 votes
0 answers
164 views

Does anyone know an explicit formula to calculate the following matrix element? It is in the context of quantum optics, $$\langle\alpha | a^n \mathcal{D}(\beta) | m\rangle,$$ where $|\alpha\rangle$ is ...
Jhordan Santiago's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
93 views

The Hilbert space is $\mathcal{H} = \mathcal{H}_q \otimes \mathbb{C}^2$. A general spinor $\Phi \in \mathcal{H}$ is $$ \Phi = \begin{pmatrix} \alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \...
Debjit Chakrabarty's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
109 views

Consider a qubit described by a Hilbert space with basis vectors $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$. The system undergoes spontaneous decay, modeled by a master equation in Lindblad form with a Lindblad ...
Michael Goerz's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
128 views

If there is a quantum state, like a wave function, how do I know in which basis should I write it should I choose the basis, for example for the hydrogen atom what ...
Moussa jaafar's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
737 views

I'm trying to understand Sakurai's explanation leading up to the projection operator, pp. 17-18 (Section 1.3.2), but I'm slightly confused by the notation. So he first says that an arbitrary ket $|\...
Mark A's user avatar
  • 153
1 vote
1 answer
258 views

In quantum mechanics, particles such as electrons do not have a fixed position until they are measured Questions: Is this indeterminacy simply due to the limitations of our current measurement ...
Tahzeeb Fatima's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
164 views

Suppose $\psi(x)$ is a properly normalized wavefunction of a particle. By definition we have that $\left<x|\psi\right> = \psi(x)$. The definition of the momentum operator (along $x$) is $\left&...
RawPasta's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
117 views

I am having trouble understanding the compactification radius of compact bosons under redefintion of the fields. Suppose we have two compact chiral bosons with period $\phi_R \sim \phi_R +2\pi$ and $\...
AnomalousFermion's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
24 views

In Quantum Mechanics, certain quantities are considered to be "measurable" or "observable". We demand the following properties of these quantities: They must be real They must be ...
user370848's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
130 views

I am reading Tong's lecture notes on CFT and I can't reproduce a result at pag. 82 $$T(z):e^{ikX(w)}:=-\frac{\alpha'^{2}k^{2}}{4}\frac{:e^{ikX(w)}:}{(z-w)^{2}}+ik\frac{:∂X(z)e^{ikX(w)}:}{z-w}+...\tag{...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 783
0 votes
0 answers
131 views

I am analyzing page 70 of Peskin & Schroeder concerning the complex conjugate, where in Eq. (3.145) they write the following: \begin{equation} \begin{split} -i\gamma^2 \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3} \...
Camillus's user avatar
  • 769

1
2 3 4 5 6