4
$\begingroup$

In higher-spin CFT, operators organize themselves into additive multi-twist. I am a bit confused as to the use of "twist-two", "leading-twist", etc. Especially when it mentioned in the context of QCD as it is used in a matter of a fact way.

Is it just the decomposition of a higher-spin operator so that it remain a primary traceless symmetric tensor operator? What I mean by that is: would a spin $J$ trace-two operator $\mathcal{O}_J$ look like $$\mathcal{O}_J = :\phi \partial_{\mu}^{J} \phi: + \partial_{\mu}(\cdots)~?$$ How do I reach this expression from the index-free notation of a higher-spin operator?

Why is twist-two the leading twist? In Lorentzian signature, why is normal ordering necessary when defining such operators?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Does the normal ordering have something to do with vertex operator algebras? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1 at 18:24

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.