I am reading Hull's Options book. He introduces a one-step binomial model and a no-arbitrage argument, using the example shown in the picture below: 
Consider a portfolio consisting of a long position in $\Delta$ shares of the stock and a short position in one call option (he does not explicitly give the strike, but he clearly assumes that it is \$20).
Question 1: Why do we short one call option? Why do we not long a call or short a put?
After some calculation, $\Delta = 0.25$, and if we assume risk-free rate is 4%, then the no-arbitrage price of the option is 0.545.
If the value of the option were more than 0.545, the portfolio would cost less than 4.455 to set up and would earn more than the risk-free rate. If the value of the option were less than 0.545, shorting the portfolio would provide a way of borrowing money at less than the risk-free rate.
Question 2: could you explain how we make a profit if the price of the option is less than 0.545? When it is less than 0.545 and we short the portfolio, do we gain \$20 $\Delta$ from the share? What about the short position of the call?