152

In .NET, how can I prevent multiple instances of an app from running at the same time and what caveats should I consider if there are multiple ways to do it?

1
  • Hanselman has a post on using the WinFormsApplicationBase class from the Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly to do this. Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 16:11

19 Answers 19

180

Use Mutex. One of the examples above using GetProcessByName has many caveats. Here is a good article on the subject:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230610150623/https://odetocode.com/blogs/scott/archive/2004/08/20/the-misunderstood-mutex.aspx

[STAThread]
static void Main() 
{
   using(Mutex mutex = new Mutex(false, "Global\\" + appGuid))
   {
      if(!mutex.WaitOne(0, false))
      {
         MessageBox.Show("Instance already running");
         return;
      }
   
      Application.Run(new Form1());
   }
}

private static string appGuid = "c0a76b5a-12ab-45c5-b9d9-d693faa6e7b9";
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

13 Comments

Using a mutex also works for non .net code as well (although the syntax would vary)
Here's a slightly more filled-out version, with some good comments: stackoverflow.com/questions/229565/…
@ClarkKent: Just a random string so that the Mutex name wont collide the name from another application.
In order to have a better control while versioning or changing your app guid, you can use: string appGuid = ((GuidAttribute)Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetCustomAttributes(typeof(GuidAttribute), true)[0]).Value; which will get the executing assembly's guid
It took me a while to realize that the above code only works, if the mutex exists as long as the instance is running. I removed the using block and changed the mutex variable to be static (or shared in vb.net). After that everything worked as expected.
|
29

Here is the code you need to ensure that only one instance is running. This is the method of using a named mutex.

public class Program
{
    static System.Threading.Mutex singleton = new Mutex(true, "My App Name");

    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        if (!singleton.WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true))
        {
            //there is already another instance running!
            Application.Exit();
        }
    }
}

3 Comments

For a WPF application use Application.Current.Shutdown(); This method works like a charm. Thanks Terrapin.
Here the main thing is you make mutex static. As well as in the other case GC will collect it.
I enjoyed the simplicity and clarity of the named Mutex. This code is concise and effective.
28
if (Process.GetProcessesByName(Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName).Length > 1)
{
  AppLog.Write("Application XXXX already running. Only one instance of this application is allowed", AppLog.LogMessageType.Warn);
  return;
}

5 Comments

@SubmarineX How you sure this article is correct? it is still controversy between mutex and codeproject.com/Articles/4975/…
Amazing Just perfect thanks for your time and efforts
-1 While this is the quick solution, it is also very easy to circumvent a.exe could be renamed to b.exe and both will run. + other cases where this simply wont work as intended. Use with caution!
This does not work with mono-develop. Under windows environments it works great though.
12

1 - Create a reference in program.cs ->

using System.Diagnostics;

2 - Put into void Main() as the first line of code ->

 if (Process.GetProcessesByName(Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName).Length >1)
                return;

That's it.

2 Comments

What's the difference of this to Mutex? Is there a catch?
It's using the name of the process. If the name is repeated then it would generate a false flag. In any other case, it's cleaner than mutex
8

After trying multiple solutions i the question. I ended up using the example for WPF here: http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/f9f215/how-to-restrict-the-application-to-just-one-instance/

public partial class App : Application  
{  
    private static Mutex _mutex = null;  

    protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e)  
    {  
        const string appName = "MyAppName";  
        bool createdNew;  

        _mutex = new Mutex(true, appName, out createdNew);  

        if (!createdNew)  
        {  
            //app is already running! Exiting the application  
            Application.Current.Shutdown();  
        }  

    }          
}  

In App.xaml:

x:Class="*YourNameSpace*.App"
StartupUri="MainWindow.xaml"
Startup="App_Startup"

Comments

6

It sounds like there are 3 fundamental techniques that have been suggested so far.

  1. Derive from the Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.WindowsFormsApplicationBase class and set the IsSingleInstance property to true. (I believe a caveat here is that this won't work with WPF applications, will it?)
  2. Use a named mutex and check if it's already been created.
  3. Get a list of running processes and compare the names of the processes. (This has the caveat of requiring your process name to be unique relative to any other processes running on a given user's machine.)

Any caveats I've missed?

2 Comments

I don't think 3 is very efficient. I'd vote for the Mutex, used it without problems many times. I've never used item 1 not sure how that flies when you're in c#.
Option 1 still works with WPF it's just slightly more involved. msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms771662.aspx
5

i tried all the solutions here and nothing worked in my C# .net 4.0 project. Hoping to help someone here the solution that worked for me:

As main class variables:

private static string appGuid = "WRITE AN UNIQUE GUID HERE";
private static Mutex mutex;

When you need to check if app is already running:

bool mutexCreated;
mutex = new Mutex(true, "Global\\" + appGuid, out mutexCreated);
if (mutexCreated)
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();

if (!mutexCreated)
{
    //App is already running, close this!
    Environment.Exit(0); //i used this because its a console app
}

I needed to close other istances only with some conditions, this worked well for my purpose

1 Comment

You don't need to actually acquire the mutex and release it. All you need to know is if another app has already created the object (i.e., its kernel reference count>=1).
4

Using Visual Studio 2005 or 2008, when you create a project for an executable, on the properties windows inside the "Application" panel, there is a check box named “Make single instance application” that you can activate to convert the application on a single instance application.

Here is a capture of the window I'm talking of:

Enter image description here

This is a Visual Studio 2008 windows application project.

6 Comments

I looked for this checkbox you mention, for my C#/WPF app, and there isn't any.
I don't see it in my VS 2008 C#/WinForms app's properties either.
Not in VS2005 as well. He must be mentioning old VB studio.
Yes the option exists, I modified the post to add a capture of the window in which you can find this option.
The option exists only for VB.NET application, not for C#. Apparently the option itself uses WinFormsApplicationBase class from the Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly.
|
3

This is the code for VB.Net

Private Shared Sub Main()
    Using mutex As New Mutex(False, appGuid)
        If Not mutex.WaitOne(0, False) Then
              MessageBox.Show("Instance already running", "ERROR", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error)
            Return
        End If

        Application.Run(New Form1())
    End Using
End Sub

This is the code for C#

private static void Main()
{
    using (Mutex mutex = new Mutex(false, appGuid)) {
        if (!mutex.WaitOne(0, false)) {
            MessageBox.Show("Instance already running", "ERROR", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);
            return;
        }

        Application.Run(new Form1());
    }
}

Comments

2

Use VB.NET! No: really ;)

using Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices;

The WindowsFormsApplicationBase from VB.Net provides you with a "SingleInstace" Property, which determines other Instances and let only one Instance run.

Comments

2
[STAThread]
static void Main()                  // args are OK here, of course
{
    bool ok;
    m = new System.Threading.Mutex(true, "YourNameHere", out ok);

    if (! ok)
    {
        MessageBox.Show("Another instance is already running.");
        return;
    }

    Application.Run(new Form1());   // or whatever was there

    GC.KeepAlive(m);                // important!
}

From: Ensuring a single instance of .NET Application

and: Single Instance Application Mutex

Same answer as @Smink and @Imjustpondering with a twist:

Jon Skeet's FAQ on C# to find out why GC.KeepAlive matters

1 Comment

-1, because you fail to use a using block with the mutex, which would make the KeepAlive superfluous. And yes, I do think John Skeet got this one wrong. He doesn't elaborate why it would be wrong to Dispose the mutex in this case.
2

Simply using a StreamWriter, how about this?

System.IO.File.StreamWriter OpenFlag = null;   //globally

and

try
{
    OpenFlag = new StreamWriter(Path.GetTempPath() + "OpenedIfRunning");
}
catch (System.IO.IOException) //file in use
{
    Environment.Exit(0);
}

Comments

1

You have to use System.Diagnostics.Process.

Check out: http://www.devx.com/tips/Tip/20044

Comments

1

(Note: this is a fun-solution! It works but uses bad GDI+ design to achieve this.)

Put an image in with your app and load it on startup. Hold it until the app exits. The user wont be able to start a 2nd instance. (Of course the mutex solution is much cleaner)

private static Bitmap randomName = new Bitmap("my_image.jpg");

4 Comments

This is actually brilliant in its simplicity, and it works with pretty much any kind of file and not just images. I feel like the Mutex solution is far from "clean." It's extremely complicated and there are apparently many ways for it to fail on account of not doing it "right." It also requires a Main() method which goes against how WPF is supposed to work.
This is kind of like bug using. It works but it's not made for that purpose. I wouldn't use it as a professional.
Yeah, it's unfortunate we don't have a solution this effective and simple without relying on exceptions.
Though it's not exactly a bug. It's still .NET behaving as intended.
0

Normally it's done with a named Mutex (use new Mutex( "your app name", true ) and check the return value), but there's also some support classes in Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll that can do it for you.

Comments

0

This worked for me in pure C#. the try/catch is when possibly a process in the list exits during your loop.

using System.Diagnostics;
....
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
...
        int procCount = 0;
        foreach (Process pp in Process.GetProcesses())
        {
            try
            {
                if (String.Compare(pp.MainModule.FileName, Application.ExecutablePath, true) == 0)
                {
                    procCount++;                        
                    if(procCount > 1) {
                       Application.Exit();
                       return;
                    }
                }
            }
            catch { }
        }
        Application.Run(new Form1());
}

Comments

0

Be sure to consider security when restricting an application to a single instance:

Full article: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20060620-13/?p=30813

We are using a named mutex with a fixed name in order to detect whether another copy of the program is running. But that also means an attacker can create the mutex first, thereby preventing our program from running at all! How can I prevent this type of denial of service attack?

...

If the attacker is running in the same security context as your program is (or would be) running in, then there is nothing you can do. Whatever "secret handshake" you come up with to determine whether another copy of your program is running, the attacker can mimic it. Since it is running in the correct security context, it can do anything that the "real" program can do.

...

Clearly you can't protect yourself from an attacker running at the same security privilege, but you can still protect yourself against unprivileged attackers running at other security privileges.

Try setting a DACL on your mutex, here's the .NET way: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.security.accesscontrol.mutexsecurity(v=vs.110).aspx

Comments

0

None of this answers worked for me because I needed this to work under Linux using monodevelop. This works great for me:

Call this method passing it a unique ID

    public static void PreventMultipleInstance(string applicationId)
    {
        // Under Windows this is:
        //      C:\Users\SomeUser\AppData\Local\Temp\ 
        // Linux this is:
        //      /tmp/
        var temporaryDirectory = Path.GetTempPath();

        // Application ID (Make sure this guid is different accross your different applications!
        var applicationGuid = applicationId + ".process-lock";

        // file that will serve as our lock
        var fileFulePath = Path.Combine(temporaryDirectory, applicationGuid);

        try
        {
            // Prevents other processes from reading from or writing to this file
            var _InstanceLock = new FileStream(fileFulePath, FileMode.OpenOrCreate, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None);
            _InstanceLock.Lock(0, 0);
            MonoApp.Logger.LogToDisk(LogType.Notification, "04ZH-EQP0", "Aquired Lock", fileFulePath);

            // todo investigate why we need a reference to file stream. Without this GC releases the lock!
            System.Timers.Timer t = new System.Timers.Timer()
            {
                Interval = 500000,
                Enabled = true,
            };
            t.Elapsed += (a, b) =>
            {
                try
                {
                    _InstanceLock.Lock(0, 0);
                }
                catch
                {
                    MonoApp.Logger.Log(LogType.Error, "AOI7-QMCT", "Unable to lock file");
                }
            };
            t.Start();

        }
        catch
        {
            // Terminate application because another instance with this ID is running
            Environment.Exit(102534); 
        }
    }         

Comments

0

For a WPF application built in Prism framework , I have used the same code of @ImJustPondering in this manner. First go to App.xaml.cs and use it in this way.

public partial class App
{
    static System.Threading.Mutex singleton = new Mutex(true, "DicomViewerApplication");
    protected override Window CreateShell()
    {
        if (!singleton.WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true))
        {
            Current.Shutdown();
        }
        return Container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
    }

    protected override void RegisterTypes(IContainerRegistry containerRegistry)
    {
        containerRegistry.RegisterSingleton<IMessageService, MessageService>();
        containerRegistry.RegisterSingleton<IEventAggregator, EventAggregator>();
    }

    protected override void ConfigureModuleCatalog(IModuleCatalog moduleCatalog)
    {
        moduleCatalog.AddModule<ModuleNameModule>();
    }
}

So before container is resolving Shell (MainWindow.xaml) we need to exit application in this way if another instance is already running.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.