Note that your model equation y = a * exp(-b * (t-t0)) + c is not well written because the four parameters a, b, t0 , c are not independent.
y = a * exp(-b * (t-t0)) + c = A * exp(-b*t) + c where A = a * exp(b * t0) which is a relationship between the parameters likely to cause trouble in nonlinear regression.
They are only three independant parameters. Better choose the equation model
y = a *exp(-b * x) + c or equivalently y = exp(-b * (x-t0)) + c with a = exp(b * t0).
If you have some difficulties to guess initial values of the parameters in order to start an iterative nonlinear regression you can use another method which isn't iterative and doesn't requires initial values.
The general principle is explained in https://fr.scribd.com/doc/14674814/Regressions-et-equations-integrales
Un example of numerical calculus is shown below.
In order to make the example easier to copy and reproduce only 20 points where taken among your points. Moreover without your data on numerical form the points where taken by graphical scanning from the figure published in the question. This is not accurate and will probably not give good results.
The page below is the screen copy of the page from MathCad sofware.

You could proceed on the same manner with your full data. The values that you will get could be used as very good initial values for any usual nonlinear regression software.
Be carefull with the notations a, b, c, which are not the same above than the notations in your question.
IN ADDITION :
A better fitting is obtained with an equation model made of two exponentials.

Blue curve : Fitted function.
Red points : Comming from scanning the pixels (2399 points) on the graph pubished by Magdalena Rodríguez in the question.
Equivalent equation (same blue curve) :

functo not make it dependent on a global scope variable. I'd add it as a parameter. Then, I'd look at the parameters and see what they mean to the equation.cshould be around 8, the y shift.ashould be close to your first y value, but since this is shifted, I'd start at that then lower.bis hard, I keep varying it and plotting the result. t0 should be the x shift.c~9,a~0.8,b~0.5,t0~16. These should give a good enough guess tocurve_fit.