Unexpected error using lambdas in Java 8

Question

I'm using Java 8 Update 20 32 bits, Maven 3.2.3, Eclipse Luna Build id: 20140612-0600 32 bits.

After starting using lambdas, some classes in my projects started to report compilation errors in maven (mvn compile).

These errors appears only when I use lambdas. If I switch back to anonymous classes, the errors are gone.

I can reproduce the error with a simple test case:

package br;

import java.awt.Button;
import java.awt.Panel;

public class Test {

    private final Button button;
    private final Panel panel;

    public Test() {
        button = new Button();
        button.addActionListener(event -> {
            System.out.println(panel);
        });
        panel = new Panel();
    }
}

I compile it this way:

mvn clean;mvn compile

And I get this error:

[ERROR] /C:/Users/fabiano/workspace-luna/Test/src/main/java/br/Test.java:[14,44] variable panel might not have been initialized

Although the error message is pretty clear about what is happening (the compiler thinks the final variable panel is being called before it is instantiated), the variable will not be called until the button generates an action, and how we can't say when the action will happen, the code should compile. Indeed, it compiles as it should if I don't use lambdas:

package br;

import java.awt.Button;
import java.awt.Panel;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;

public class Test {

    private final Button button;
    private final Panel panel;

    public Test() {
        button = new Button();
        button.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
            @Override
            public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
                System.out.println(panel);
            }
        });
        panel = new Panel();
    }
}

I noticed two other strange things related to this problem:

Eclipse don't report this error when it auto-compile the class. Eclipse is using the same JDK as maven to compile the class.
If I use maven to compile the class using anonymous classes, then I change the class to use lambdas and compile it using maven again, it doesn't report the error. In this case it just reports the error again if I use mvn clean followed by mvn compile.

Can someone help me to fix this problem? Or try to reproduce this problem?

First of all, you shouldn't add listener during instance construction. This leads to reference leakage and considered as a very bad practice in concurrent programming. Now, about your final fields. It's obviously initialized after you create listener referencing to this panel. — mkrakhin
– mkrakhin, Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 12:19
Why can't you just initialize panel field before adding action listener? Panel field is final, it MUST be initialized in your constructor anyways. — Alex
– Alex, Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 12:21
@mkrakhin got a reference for that? I can't see this causing a leak. And even if it does, why would in constructor or in another method make a difference? — weston
– weston, Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 13:02
Because final fields freezing occurs only at the end of instance construction. — mkrakhin
– mkrakhin, Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 13:05
The code is safe in this case, at least as long as the Button isn't displayed (thus becoming capable of being clicked) during the constructor (which should not happen anyway, since Swing isn't thread-safe) — Giulio Franco
– Giulio Franco, Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 14:34

Community · Accepted Answer · 2020-06-20 09:12:55Z

9

Although the error message is pretty clear about what is happening (the compiler thinks the final variable "panel" is being called before it is instantiated), the variable will not be called until the button generates an action, and how we can´t say when the action will happen, the code should compile.

You should consider the fact that compilers follow formal rules and don’t have your knowledge. Especially, a compiler can’t know that the method addActionListener does not invoke the actionPerformed method immediately. It also has no idea about the visibility of the button which determines when actionPerformed might be called.

The formal behavior has a specification. There you find the following points:

Chapter 16. Definite Assignment

Each local variable (§14.4) and every blank final field (§4.12.4, §8.3.1.2) must have a definitely assigned value when any access of its value occurs.

An access to its value consists of the simple name of the variable (or, for a field, the simple name of the field qualified by this) occurring anywhere in an expression except as the left-hand operand of the simple assignment operator = (§15.26.1).

and

15.27.2. Lambda Body

…

Unlike code appearing in anonymous class declarations, the meaning of names and the this and super keywords appearing in a lambda body, along with the accessibility of referenced declarations, are the same as in the surrounding context (except that lambda parameters introduce new names).

In your code, the meaning of names within the lambda body, read of panel, is the same as in the surrounding context which is the constructor. In that context, the rule that “every blank final field must have a definitely assigned value when any access of its value occurs” applies.

And, yes, that’s different from inner class definitions. The specification explicitly states that.

edited Jun 20, 2020 at 9:12

CommunityBot

11 silver badge

answered Sep 11, 2014 at 15:33

Holger

301k43 gold badges481 silver badges827 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

4 Comments

Fabiano Over a year ago

@Holger, thanks for your answer, now it's clear for me that lambdas have a different behavior compared to anonymous classes. I tought the compiler just 'replaced' the lambda for the respective anonymous class under the hood and the behavior should be the same.

a better oliver Over a year ago

My bad. You're right. I'd argue that because of the way lamdbas work under the hood a referenced field (like panel) is in fact accessed at the time the lamdba is created.

Holger Over a year ago

@zeroflagL: that’s implementation dependent, the decision of the compiler, to be more exactly. Test with current javac revealed that it’s not accessing panel at creation time but reading it like any non-final field. But other compilers may do it differently.

Tony BenBrahim Over a year ago

Somehow this worked for me in Eclipse, and did not fail until I used Maven to compile

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Unexpected error using lambdas in Java 8

1 Answer 1

Chapter 16. Definite Assignment

15.27.2. Lambda Body

4 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

4 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related