5
$\begingroup$

There are infinitely many sets of distinct primes whose squares add up to a square number and, presumably, sets of any size (https://mathoverflow.net/questions/501745/primes-whose-squares-add-up-to-another-square).

Find one of these that can be used to perfectly tile a square, like Duijvestijn's famous order-21 perfect squared square, but with all its squares of prime side, or show this is not possible.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Presumably there must be more than one square within the square, and each prime can be used once only, or there is the trivial solution of four equal squares. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 19 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ Have you constructed a solution to this problem? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 19 at 23:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is it required that all squares have a distinct size? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20 at 3:23

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

Answer: No.

Proof: Consider the Smith diagram of a squaring:

Smith diagram
Source: Wikipedia

This is a planar graph where vertices represent horizontal segments, edges represent squares, and faces represent vertical segments. Suppose we have a prime perfect squaring whose Smith diagram has v vertices, e edges, and f faces.

Consider any vertex besides the two poles. The sum of its incoming edges equals the sum of its outgoing edges. If it had only 1 of each, then they would be equal, and the squaring would be imperfect, so its degree must be at least 3. If its adjacent edges are all odd primes, then there must be an even number of them, so its degree must be at least 4, unless it is one of at most 2 vertices adjacent to an even prime (2). For the poles themselves, both must have degree at least 2 (else our squaring would only have 1 square), and one must have degree at least 3 (else 2 squares would overlap in the center of our squaring). In summary, v − 4 vertices have degree at least 4, 3 of the others have degree at least 3, and the last has degree at least 2, so the sum of the degrees of the vertices is at least 4v − 5. This double counts each edge, so 2e ≥ 4v − 5 ⇒ 4v ≤ 2e + 5.

Similarly, consider any face. The sum of the edges on its left equals the sum of the edges on its right. For perfection, it must border at least 3 edges. For primality, it must border at least 4 edges, unless it is one of at most 2 faces bordering a 2. Therefore, the sum over all faces of the number of edges bordering them is at least 4f − 2. This double counts each edge, so 2e ≥ 4f − 2 ⇒ 4f ≤ 2e + 2.

Because we have a connected plane graph, Euler's formula gives v − e + f = 2. Multiplying by 4 and substituting the two inequalities gives 8 = 4v − 4e + 4f ≤ (2e + 5) - 4e + (2e + 2) = 7 — a contradiction. Therefore, no prime perfect squaring exists.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see no particular use of primeness, or of all the small squares being all distinct, so I suppose this argument applies to all simple squares containing at most one even-sized square then? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20 at 13:53
  • $\begingroup$ Surely the "simple" constraint would be sufficient for those? Unless I misunderstood something, both of those deductions arise directly from "you can never have two equal squares sharing a full edge", which is also a property of all simple squarings, by virtue of them not having any rectangles made of more than one square. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20 at 18:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Bass Oh, I see what you mean now. You're right, this means that a squaring with at most 1 even could be neither perfect nor simple. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20 at 19:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.