I create a context and a provider as below. As you can see, I use useState() within my provider (for state) along with functions (all passed within an object as the value prop, allows for easy destructuring whatever I need in child components).
import React, { useState, createContext } from "react";
const CountContext = createContext(null);
export const CountProvider = ({ children }) => {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
const incrementCount = () => {
setCount(count + 1);
};
const decrementCount = () => {
setCount(count - 1);
};
return (
<CountContext.Provider value={{ count, incrementCount, decrementCount }}>
{children}
</CountContext.Provider>
);
};
export default CountContext;
I wrap my app within such a provider(s) at a higher location such as at index.js. And consume the state using useContext() as below.
import React, { useContext } from "react";
import CountContext from "../contexts/CountContext";
import Incrementer from "./Incrementer";
import Decrementer from "./Decrementer";
const Counter = () => {
const { count } = useContext(CountContext);
return (
<div className="counter">
<div className="count">{count}</div>
<div className="controls">
<Decrementer />
<Incrementer />
</div>
</div>
);
};
export default Counter;
Everything is working just fine, and I find it easier to maintain things this way as compared to some of the other methods of (shared) state management.
CodeSandbox: https://codesandbox.io/s/react-usecontext-simplified-consumption-hhfz6
I am wondering if there is a fault or flaw here that I haven't noticed yet?