Kotlin primary and secondary constructors during inheritance

Question

I am learning Kotlin and I'm kind of stuck with the constructors. I've written a program to help me understand the concept. The program is as follows:

open class Animal(){
    var name :String = "noname";
    constructor(name:String):this(){
        this.name = name
    }
    open fun eat(){
        println("$name the animal is eating")
    }
}
class Dog: Animal{
    constructor():super()
    constructor(name : String):super(name)
    override fun eat(){
        println("$name the dog is eating")
    }
}
fun main (args:Array<String>){
    var a1 = Animal("foo")
    var a2 = Animal()
    var d1 = Dog("bar")
    var d2 = Dog()
    a1.eat()
    a2.eat()
    d1.eat()
    d2.eat()
}

Is it possible to modify the program so that the child class calls the parent's primary constructor without using another secondary constructor.
What I'm trying to achieve here is to not force the user to pass a parameter while creating objects using primary and secondary constructors.

Please forgive me if my question is dumb. I am novice here.

DAA · Accepted Answer · 2018-05-11 11:20:53Z

0

In Kotlin, you can set the default value in the constructor itself:

open class Animal(var name: String = "noname"){
    open fun eat(){
        println("$name the animal is eating")
    }
}
class Dog(name: String = "noname"): Animal(name){
    override fun eat(){
        println("$name the dog is eating")
    }
}

This way, "noname" is assigned if no string is provided when invoking the constructor. Also, when you create a Dog object, it will always call the parent constructor.

answered May 11, 2018 at 11:20

DAA

1,3862 gold badges12 silver badges21 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

6 Comments

rdias002 Over a year ago

Oh cool! Thanks. Although, would it have been possible without the default values? Just curious.

DAA Over a year ago

You could make 'name' nullable and set it to null in the constructor if no name is provided. If you don't want it nullable but still want two different constructors (with and without name), then you have to implement both constructors separately.

rdias002 Over a year ago

Implementing both constructors separately would mean the same thing that I did in the question?

DAA Over a year ago

That is correct, although you are setting a default value for name anyway in your question. Right now, the code you wrote and mine do the same thing

rdias002 Over a year ago

Okay... So what I take of this is that there is no other way to get the same output without using default values or the null thingy that you mentioned or two different secondary constructors. That right? Because what I was actually expecting was something of the sort: class Dog(): Animal()

|

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Kotlin primary and secondary constructors during inheritance

1 Answer 1

6 Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

6 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related