XML Building in C# Windows or ASP Application

Question

I am passing lot of XML Parameters from my application to the SQL Server (both windows and ASP.Net application)

Earlier i used to build XML using the based concatenation operator in string, similar to the one below.

string XmlDetails = string.Empty;
XmlDetails = "<APPLICATION><SEND>";
XmlDetails += "<ID>" + txtCardNo.Text.ToString() + "</ID>";
XmlDetails += "</SEND></APPLICATION>";

The application really used to hog memory and was really slow. I changes the concatenation method to String Builder class to build big XML.

 XmlDetails = string.Format("{0}<{1}>{2}</{1}>", "<APPLICATION><SEND>", "ID", txtCardNo.Text.ToString()); 
 XmlDetails = string.Format("{0}<{1}>{2}</{1}>{3}", XmlDetails, "PAYDET", txtPOSPaydet.Text.ToString(), "</SEND></APPLICATION>");

While using the above method there was a drastic change in the memory levels used by my application.

I would like to know if there are any better methods which could be employed in my application.

Also try using StringBuilder instead of string concatenation. — Hari Prasad
– Hari Prasad, Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 8:52
@HariPrasad string.format is a subset of the string builder class right ? Differences are there between both ? — Dilip
– Dilip, Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 8:55
@Dilip, description of XElement + examples: msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/…. my answer for another question on SO: stackoverflow.com/questions/28745459/… — ASh
– ASh, Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 8:58

Yannick Meeus · Accepted Answer · 2015-03-11 09:08:12Z

1

There are several options available to you:

XElement, which allows you to handcraft your XML without having to build the string itself, but rather like so:

XElement xmlTree1 = new XElement("Root",
    new XElement("Child1", 1),
    new XElement("Child2", 2),
    new XElement("Child3", 3)
);

Console.WriteLine(xmlTree2);

This will write to the console:

<Root>
  <Child1>1</Child1>
  <Child2>2</Child2>
  <Child3>3</Child3>
</Root>

If your XML format is static, you can also create an object representing your data, mark it as [Serializable], then serialize it:

public static void Main(string[] args)
{
    var myObjectToSerialize = new Root()
    {
        Child1 = 1,
        Child2 = 2,
        Child3 = 3
    };

    var serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(Root));
    serializer.Serialize(Console.Out, myObjectToSerialize);
    Console.ReadKey();
}

With the following class:

[Serializable]
public class Root
{
    public int Child1 { get; set; }

    public int Child2 { get; set; }

    public int Child3 { get; set; }
}

answered Mar 11, 2015 at 9:08

Yannick Meeus

5,9601 gold badge39 silver badges34 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

6 Comments

Dilip Over a year ago

My XML is not static. It is built using different elements on the Form and other global values which could change. Can this serializer method be applied in dynamic also with dynamic variable sets ?

Yannick Meeus Over a year ago

You can use an anonymous type, and then give this a go. It details an extension method that should help. But if your XML structure will change depending on other factors, then I'd just recommend the XDocument/XElement route.

Dilip Over a year ago

Yes, I was thinking like making different serializable objects for different methods that i need. Like if i using it for a specific table then create an XML serializer for that specifc purpose and use it . But actually are there any performance impacts while using any of these methods over the existing ones which i use ?

Yannick Meeus Over a year ago

Personally, if the number one priorities are to generate raw XML and forgo the security blanket that the baked in XML serialization provides, then you can stick to a StringBuilder. But I'd try both, do some measuring (performance, memory, the works). If the difference is negligible, I'd highly recommend going with the native APIs. They give you so much more security when working with XML.

Dilip Over a year ago

is there some tool or procedures that has to be employed to compare between two methods ?

|

Peter · Accepted Answer · 2015-03-11 09:06:22Z

0

Why not use XDocument class.

var doc = new XDocument(
                    new XElement("APPLICATION",
                        new XElement("SEND",
                            new XElement("ID", txtCardNo.Text.ToString())
                            )
                        )
                    );

answered Mar 11, 2015 at 9:06

Peter

4937 silver badges17 bronze badges

3 Comments

Dilip Over a year ago

which one would me the most memory efficient.

Yannick Meeus Over a year ago

Practically everything will be more memory efficient when compared to base string concatenation.

Peter Over a year ago

As mentioned @YannickMeeus string concatenation is costly operation. XmlDocument or XDocument provides already API to manipulate the XML in efficient way for majority of the scenarios.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

XML Building in C# Windows or ASP Application

2 Answers 2

6 Comments

3 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

6 Comments

3 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related