Skip to main content

Questions tagged [special-relativity]

The special theory of relativity describes the motion and dynamics of objects moving at significant fractions of the speed of light.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
217 views

From what I understand, in relativistic and non-relativistic mechanics, we model the universe as an affine space $(E,\vec{E},-)$ where $E=\vec{E}=\mathbb{R}^4$. An orthogonal cartesian coordinate ...
Vulgar Mechanick's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
188 views

Is the reasoning below correct? According to Einstein's point-coincidence argument, measurements correspond to the contact or intersection of world lines of objects or particles. Lorentz ...
How About This's user avatar
3 votes
5 answers
1k views

When I read Dirac's general theory of relativity, I have some questions. The author assume $c=1$ and $$ t=x^0, x=x^1, y=x^2, z=x^3 \tag{1} $$ Therefore, $$ ( x^0)^2 -(x^1)^2 -(x^2)^2 -(x^3)^2 \tag{2} ...
Enhao Lan's user avatar
  • 471
0 votes
1 answer
128 views

I have to solve a problem of relativistic elastic collisions: a particle with velocity v collides with a stationary particle. The collision is linear and elastic, both particles have mass m. I need to ...
Nogia's user avatar
  • 5
1 vote
0 answers
93 views

Im trying to learn the material but also not get bogged down on everything I can't do. I've spent an obscene amount of time on this over the last few days. Good advice on navigating that middle ...
trying_to_learn's user avatar
-1 votes
3 answers
265 views

One of the tenets of relativity lies in the fact that the form of any physical equation must not depend on a particular choice of a coordinate system I was wondering if this implies the fact that some ...
Davyz2's user avatar
  • 914
1 vote
0 answers
139 views

I tried to check whether the usual plane-wave expansion for a Klein-Gordon Hermitian field is a scalar, meaning it transforms correctly under Poincaré transformations: $$\hat{U}(\Lambda,a)\hat{\phi}(x)...
Christian Palumbo's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
135 views

if an object or person were to travel back in time, their mass-energy would disappear from the present and reappear in the past. This would imply: A net creation of energy at the moment of ...
D B's user avatar
  • 39
1 vote
2 answers
164 views

Motivated by Andy Weir's novel Hail Mary, I was just reading an answer regarding the time needed to travel between stars with a constant acceleration (and deceleration after the mid-way point). Due to ...
Peter - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
335 views

When concerning the Lorentz transformation property of an local operator $O_a(x)$ (say, a quantum field) with Lorentz index $a$, we usually write $$ U(\Lambda) O_a(x) U(\Lambda)^{-1} = \sum_b D_{ab}(\...
Covariant's user avatar
  • 101
0 votes
2 answers
138 views

I am trying to find an intuitive explanation to the phenomenon if inductive kickback, where if you disconnect suddenly an inductor that has it's magnetic field charged, the voltage of it's terminals ...
Joaquin Brandan's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
327 views

This question is related to different motivations for the need of gauge invariance in QFT. I was introduced to gauge invariance in the following way. Consider a vector field $A^\mu(x)$, with $x\equiv ...
QuantizedObject's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
151 views

The restricted Lorentz subgroup, $SO^{+}(1,3)$ is a subgroup of Lorentz Group, which has a real dimension 6. What then is the manifold dimension of $SO(1,3)$, the full Lorentz Group?
Mainak Chandra's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
89 views

I am new to Tensors and the math of Special Relativity. I need to solve the Realtivistic Raychaudhuri's eqaution but unable to proceed. I got the Raychaudhuri's equation from Dr.Joseph Samuel's paper ...
Durai Renganatha A S's user avatar
3 votes
6 answers
439 views

When deriving length contraction, we assume that a rod with length $L$ in rest frame lies on x axis.To simplify, we assume that in frame S, it only has a velocity in direction of x axis. To derive ...
Interstellar's user avatar
  • 1,614
0 votes
2 answers
162 views

Consider an object with a worldline $$x = -vt+x_0$$ and an observer at $$x=0$$ such that the object is moving towards the observer with velocity $v$. From each point $(x,\frac{x_0-x}{v})$ in the ...
Tachyon's user avatar
  • 661
-1 votes
2 answers
172 views

Text of the exercise: Event B is a consequence of event A. Using Lorentz transformations, prove that there is no inertial frame for which Event B happens before event A. I wanted for someone to say ...
Kyrylo Lyskov's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
225 views

I am grappling with a consistency issue when analyzing the force on a charged particle from different inertial reference frames, strictly within the realm of classical (pre-relativistic) ...
Jyothi Srivalli's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
198 views

Has anyone ever performed, or proposed, a real experiment to directly test Einstein's light clock thought experiment? Is this realistic?
Rich D's user avatar
  • 385
3 votes
4 answers
597 views

I am slightly confused about the way one would compute the travel duration of an object as seen in two different inertial frames. I have an inertial frame $S$ and another frame $S^\prime$ that moves ...
ibroketheinternet's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
267 views

In the textbook classical mechanics written by Professor Liu Chuan(刘川) in Peking University, in chapter 2.8, the author directly writes down the action of a classical relativistic particle coupled to ...
xiang sun's user avatar
  • 880
5 votes
0 answers
168 views

I spent all of last semester learning all about Wilson’s RG, but a few days ago I realized an incredibly basic and mildly disturbing fact. Nature is Lorentzian, not Euclidean. I have been Wick rotated ...
wlancer's user avatar
  • 404
1 vote
1 answer
152 views

This question inquires about motion under a constant 4-force in 1D. My confusion lies in what constant 4-force actually means. Does it mean: A constant 4-vector over proper or coordinate time (as a ...
TheorVHP's user avatar
-6 votes
2 answers
250 views

According to special relativity, two events can be a cause and effect of each other if those two events can be found in any lightcone. This contrasts with Galilean relativity, where two events can be ...
Whiter Fox's user avatar
-6 votes
1 answer
228 views

Relativistic “Cover-Up” Paradox Two identical plates A and B (same rest length , same breadth) are initially parallel, one behind the other. In lab frame : Plate A is at rest. Plate B moves along +x ...
OP BOSS's user avatar