14

I have a many-to-many relationship defined like so:

Employees
--------------
EmployeeID (PK)

Roles
--------------
RoleID (PK)

EmployeeRoles
--------------
EmployeeID (PK, FK)
RoleID (PK, FK)

I'm trying to get a list of Employees, given a list or RoleIDs:

private MyDBEntities _entities;

public SqlEmployeesRepository(MyDBEntities entities)
{            
    _entities = entities;
}

public IQueryable<Employee> GetEmployeesForRoles(int[] roleIds)
{
    // get employees
}

But if I try and do _entities.EmployeeRoles, there is no EmployeeRoles object. My edmx looks like this:

enter image description here

So it's recognizing the relationship between the two tables, but it's not creating an entity object for EmployeeRoles.

How can I get a distinct list of Employees given a list of role id's?

2 Answers 2

32

The relationship between the tables Role and Employee is represented as a navigation property - each Employees property in the Role entity will only contain the Employees that have this particular role.

Putting it the other way round - every Employee's Roles property only contains the roles that particular employee has.

Given a set of roles roleIds to look for you can use this to get the list of employees that have a role within that set:

public IQueryable<Employee> GetEmployeesForRoles(int[] roleIds)
{
    var employees = _entities.Employees
                             .Where( x=> x.Roles.Any(r => roleIds.Contains(r.RoleID)))
   return employees;
}

Edit:

The other way to get the employees is to attack the problem from the other side of the relationship (starting with the role, not the employee). This is most likely not as efficient as the first approach, since we have to de-duplicate employees (otherwise employees with i.e. two roles would show up twice):

public IQueryable<Employee> GetEmployeesForRoles(int[] roleIds)
{
    var employees = _entities.Roles
                             .Where( r => roleIds.Contains(r.RoleID))
                             .SelectMany( x=> x.Employees)
                             .Distinct()
   return employees;
}
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Lol, I was just going to post this as an alternative to your first solution (with Distinct etc.), but now it's no alternative anymore. Can you leave your first solution as another option in your answer. It was an interesting way, or was something wrong with it?
@Slauma: Yes it is an alternative - but this seemed more straight-forward after looking at the problem for so I scratched the first approach - let me dig it up again ;-)
3

Maybe?

var results = from r in db.Roles
              where roleIds.Contains(r.Id)
              select r.Employees;

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.