I am trying to index a multidimensional array (4-dimensions) in numpy. The shape of the array is of (125,125,125,3). I have 3 separate 2D lists of index arrays. The lists are of size (N,4), (M,4), and (1,4) respectively. The 3 separate lists represent the rows, columns, and depth values in the 4D array that I am trying to index. For example consider the following:
ix = [[0,1,2,3],
[3,4,5,6]]
iy = [[2,3,4,5],
[5,6,7,8]]
iz = [[1,2,3,4]]
weights.shape = (125,125,125,3)
I want to index weights with every possible combination of row, column, and depth index arrays in ix,iy, and iz. For example, if I take the first row in each of the index matrices, that means I want to select rows [0,1,2,3], columns [2,3,4,5], and depth values [1,2,3,4] in weights. I always want to select all elements in the 4th dimension of weights. This means that I am essentially selecting a (4,4,4,3) slice of weights.
Right now, I have implemented this by indexing with loops using the following code
w = np.empty(shape=(X,Y,Z,4,4,4,weights.ndim-1))
for i in range(X):
for j in range(Y):
w_ij = np.ix_(ix[i,:], iy[j,:], iz[0,:])
w[i,j,0,:,:,:,:] = weights[w_ij[0], w_ij[1], w_ij[2], :]
My final goal is to construct the multidimensional array w that is of shape (N,M,1,4,4,4,3) as fast as possible. This part of the code is going to run multiple times, so if there is a vectorized way of doing this with built-in numpy functions, that would be ideal.
Please let me know if there are any clarifying questions. This is my first time asking a question on stack overflow, so I apologize if anything is unclear or confusing!
ix_only accepts 1d arrays (I think), look at resultingw_ij. I can imagine generalizing those arrays to work with alliandjat once. Awwith shape (N,4,M,4,...) might be easiest to produce, but can be transposed later. I'd have experiment on a ipython session to help with more details.ix_only accepts 1d arrays. Can you elaborate on how you think we can generalizew_ijto operate on alliandjat once? To me, it doesn't matter if the shape ofwis out of order since I can always fix that after. If what you are suggesting is possible, that would speed up my code significantly.