7

Does anyone know how to make ajax request function that works cross-browser WITHOUT using a javascript framework like jQuery, etc.?

4
  • I think it's all over the web. I'm afraid to mention w3school, but it's on the first result on google!! search for ajax tutorials Commented May 6, 2011 at 6:52
  • 1
    i'm trying to make embedable js code, so it need to be small and portable Commented May 6, 2011 at 7:30
  • 3
    "Also, try google." Hey, that's how I got here. I guess it worked! Commented Apr 7, 2013 at 3:51
  • Practically every tutorial out there is using some sort of framework, usually JQuery. I don't want to include an entire library just to do a simple AJAX request! Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 1:37

2 Answers 2

10

The XMLHttpRequest object isn't actually all that complicated to use. To be broadly compatible, you have to play a bit of a game to create the object, but after that it's fairly straightforward for simple operations.

Microsoft has examples on the MSDN page for XMLHttpRequest, including a function for creating the object in a cross-browser way that supports early versions of IE. Here's their example:

function getXMLHttpRequest() 
{
    if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {
        return new window.XMLHttpRequest;
    }
    else {
        try {
            return new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.XMLHTTP.3.0");
        }
        catch(ex) {
            return null;
        }
    }
}

function handler()
{
    if (oReq.readyState == 4 /* complete */) {
        if (oReq.status == 200) {
            alert(oReq.responseText);
        }
    }
}

var oReq = getXMLHttpRequest();

if (oReq != null) {
    oReq.open("GET", "http://localhost/test.xml", true);
    oReq.onreadystatechange = handler;
    oReq.send();
}
else {
    window.alert("AJAX (XMLHTTP) not supported.");
}

I'm not suggesting the above exemplifies best practices (Microsoft seems to have their MSDN examples largely written by very, very inexperienced engineers), but it gives you a starting point. For instance, the above requires that the response status be 200 for success, where of course the HTTP specification is clear that anything the 200 <= n <= 299 range is "success".

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

+1. Really, Microsoft needs to work on the quality of the code used in their MSDN examples, but this is a good starting point.
2

i often use this method for sending and receiving only json in modern browsers (no old-ie's)

function aj(method, url, data, cb){

    var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
    xhr.onreadystatechange = readystatechange;
    xhr.open(method, url);
    xhr.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
    xhr.send(data && JSON.stringify(data));

    function readystatechange(){
        if(this.readyState === this.DONE) {

            switch(this.status){
                case 200:
                if(this.getResponseHeader('Content-Type').split(';')[0] !== 'application/json'){
                    return cb("unexpected Content-Type: '" + this.getResponseHeader('Content-Type') + "'", null);
                }
                return cb(null, JSON.parse(this.response));

                case 401:
                location.href = '/authentication/login';
                return;

                default:
                return cb("unexpected status: " + this.status + "", null);
            }
        }
    }//readystatechange
}

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.