54

I've got a column in a table (eg. UserName) which I want to make sure is unique. So I create a unique key for that column and call it IX_Users_UserName.

Now, if I do lots of searching for users based on their username I want to make sure there is an index for that field.

Do I need to create a separate index, or is the unique key also considered an index, just like the primary key is a clustered unique key?

2
  • 2
    I feel the need to point out that a primary key is not automatically a clustered unique key. Your clustered index is not required to be on the primary key. Commented Jul 21, 2010 at 19:23
  • Also see stackoverflow.com/questions/564895/… Commented Sep 20, 2011 at 19:06

3 Answers 3

42

Unique Key: Unique Key enforces uniqueness of the column on which they are defined. Unique Key creates a non-clustered index on the column. Unique Key allows only one NULL Value.

Alter table to add unique constraint to column:

ALTER TABLE Authors ADD CONSTRAINT IX_Authors_Name UNIQUE(Name) GO

Source

More information from MSDN.

FWIW -- if your constraint doesn't create an index, I would avoid naming it IX_ as that would typically be assumed to be associated with one (IX = Index).

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Cheers :) perfect answer. I'll also reanme all my unique keys to IX and drop the single index i had on those fields (why double up ... that's bad!). Cheers!
I like to prefix my unique indexes distinctively from non-unique indexes: UI or UIX. UK is also acceptable but does tell this is an index.
24

Basically, in SQL Server, a unique constraint is indeed realized by means of a unique index.

The differences between a UNIQUE constraint and a UNIQUE INDEX are quite subtle, really. If you create a UNIQUE INDEX, you can reference that in a foreign key constraints from another table (doesn't work if you create a UNIQUE constraint....).

So what's the difference? Well - a unique constraint really is more of a logical thing on a table - you want to express the intent that the contents of a given column (or group of columns) is unique.

A unique index (like most indices) is more of a "behind-the-scenes" implementation detail.

From my point of view, unless you really have a problem with it, I'd always use a UNIQUE INDEX - the benefit of being part of a referential integrity constraint is quite valid and can be very useful in certain cases. Functionally, in practice, there's no difference between using a Unique Constraint vs. Unique Index, really.

Comments

2

A unique key is an index in I suspect almost every database product. It has to be, otherwise the database would have a hard time enforcing it: when you insert a value, the database has to answer, "does that value already exist?" The sane way to do that is consult an index.

I don't have a SQL Server in front of me to test, but I'd be shocked if it didn't.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.