2

I have a dtype as follows:

pose_dtype = np.dtype([('x', np.float64), ('y', np.float64), ('theta', np.float64)])

Right now, I can write:

pose = np.array((1, 2, np.pi), dtype=pose_dtype)

I'd like to add an xy field to make this easier to work with. I can do this with:

pose_dtype = np.dtype(dict(
    names=['x', 'y', 'theta', 'xy'],
    formats=[np.float64, np.float64, np.float64, (np.float64, 2)],
    offsets=[0, 8, 16, 0]
))

However, now I can no longer construct the array using my previous method, and have to resort to:

pose = np.array((1, 2, np.pi, [1, 2]), dtype=pose_dtype)

Which is dangerously repetitious.

Is there any way I can mark the properties as aliases of one another, so that I don't have to deal with this?

3
  • How about filling the array by field rather than by record? dtype offsets is a rather rare topic on SO. I'll have to experiment to find alternatives. Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 17:22
  • But you know that you can access multiple fields by pose[['x','y']]? Without any aliasing. Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 17:25
  • @MSeifert: But the result of doing that gives a structured type, not an unstructured one - i can't use np.dot on the result of that Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 17:26

1 Answer 1

1

Experiments in filling an array by field rather than by record

In [207]: pose_dtype = np.dtype(dict(
    names=['x', 'y', 'theta', 'xy'],
    formats=[np.float64, np.float64, np.float64, (np.float64, 2)],
    offsets=[0, 8, 16, 0]
))

In [209]: A=np.zeros((3,),dtype=pose_dtype)
In [210]: A
Out[210]: 
array([(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, [0.0, 0.0]), (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, [0.0, 0.0]),
       (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, [0.0, 0.0])], 
      dtype={'names':['x','y','theta','xy'], 'formats':['<f8','<f8','<f8',('<f8', (2,))], 'offsets':[0,8,16,0], 'itemsize':24})
In [211]: A['x']=[1,2,3]
In [212]: A
Out[212]: 
array([(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, [1.0, 0.0]), (2.0, 0.0, 0.0, [2.0, 0.0]),
       (3.0, 0.0, 0.0, [3.0, 0.0])], 
      dtype={'names':['x','y','theta','xy'], 'formats':['<f8','<f8','<f8',('<f8', (2,))], 'offsets':[0,8,16,0], 'itemsize':24})
In [213]: A['y']=[4,5,6]
In [214]: A
Out[214]: 
array([(1.0, 4.0, 0.0, [1.0, 4.0]), (2.0, 5.0, 0.0, [2.0, 5.0]),
       (3.0, 6.0, 0.0, [3.0, 6.0])], 
      dtype={'names':['x','y','theta','xy'], 'formats':['<f8','<f8','<f8',('<f8', (2,))], 'offsets':[0,8,16,0], 'itemsize':24})
In [215]: A['xy']
Out[215]: 
array([[ 1.,  4.],
       [ 2.,  5.],
       [ 3.,  6.]])
In [216]: A['xy']=np.arange(10,16).reshape(3,2)
In [217]: A
Out[217]: 
array([(10.0, 11.0, 0.0, [10.0, 11.0]), (12.0, 13.0, 0.0, [12.0, 13.0]),
       (14.0, 15.0, 0.0, [14.0, 15.0])], 
      dtype={'names':['x','y','theta','xy'], 'formats':['<f8','<f8','<f8',('<f8', (2,))], 'offsets':[0,8,16,0], 'itemsize':24})

In [219]: A['xy'].dot(A['xy'].T)
Out[219]: 
array([[ 221.,  263.,  305.],
       [ 263.,  313.,  363.],
       [ 305.,  363.,  421.]])

another way of getting the 2 fields as a float array (not pretty)

In [228]: A[['x','y']].view(float).reshape(-1,2)
Out[228]: 
array([[ 10.,  11.],
       [ 12.,  13.],
       [ 14.,  15.]])
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

x2[['x', 'y']].view((np.float64, 2)) does the job at getting the two fields, it turns out
I hadn't thought to use a compound dtype like that in view. It cleans up the reshape nuisance - though speed's the same. Your 'xy' field access is faster.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.