Yes, it is the same variable.
I'm not sure how much you know. So, I'm going to explain in detail. Scoping in JavaScript is at the function level*. Think of function definitions as points on a tree. Each point on the tree is a scope. When using a variable, you can only use what is at your current scope and anything available to ancestors going up to the top (global scope). Here are a few rules & examples that may help you better understand:
*UPDATE: ES6 const and let are block-level
Inner functions have access to outer function-level variables
function a() {
var a = 4;
function b() {
alert(a); /* a = 4 */
}
}
Parameters are defined at the same scope as if they were defined one line below
function a(a) {
// variable "a" is at same scope as the example above
function b() {
alert(a);
}
}
Variables in adjacent functions are not accessible
Function a() is the parent. b() and c() are its children. Those children cannot access each other's variables.
function a() {
function b() {
var aValue = 2;
}
function c() {
alert(aValue); /* "aValue" is undefined here */
}
}
Location of function definition is what counts
This returns 5 if you run main();:
function getValue(returnFunc) {
var a = 7;
alert(returnFunc());
}
function main() {
var a = 5;
getValue(function() { return a; }); // anonymous function becomes "returnFunc"
}
Lastly, variable overriding
(function getValue() {
var a = 5;
(function () {
var a = 7;
alert(a);
})();
alert(a);
})();
I tried to avoid using self-invoking functions/IIFEs for these examples but I just couldn't help myself on this last one. It's the easiest way, I think. Run this and you'll get 7, then 5. But, if you exclude "var" on that inner "a"...
(function getValue() {
var a = 5;
(function () {
a = 7;
alert(a);
})();
alert(a);
})();
You'll get 7, 7. This is because "var" creates a new space in memory. Also, if there is a name conflict with something in a higher scope, it gets overridden as a different variable (despite having the same name).
For some more examples, please see: What is the scope of variables in JavaScript?
errorvariable defined, so the answer is yes.varin the loop, however aforEachloop cannot be aborted. So checking the error should be done in the callback before you get into the loop. If you need to check in the loop for whatever reason a different looping method should be employed.