Node.js - Using the async lib - async.parallel pass an Array

Question

I have below function which fetches data in parallel. Once the fetching data is done the result will be available via 'results' variable in the callback function. I needs to parameterize instead of hard coding 'products', 'images' etc. I need to be able to pass an array. (i.e I need to say var fetchInParallel = function (id, res, names) ) where names = ['products', 'images']

How would I do that? I tried using forEach with no luck.

var fetchInParallel = function (id, res) {

async.parallel(
    [
        function (callback) {
            commonService.findById('products', id, function (result) {
                callback(false, result);
            })
        },

        function (callback) {
            commonService.findById('images', id, function (result) {
                callback(false, result);
            })
        }

    ],

    function (err, results) {
        // handle errors code

        var products = results[0];
        var volatile = results[1];

        var target = stitch(products,images);

        res.send(target)
    }
);
}

How would your result callback look like if it had to deal with dynamic names, instead of hardcoded products and volatile images? — Bergi
– Bergi, Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 17:58
in fact they are dynamic names, the stich function will iterate the results and stitch the final result. — ravindrab
– ravindrab, Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 18:24

Bergi · Accepted Answer · 2015-02-26 18:29:05Z

3

You're looking for the map function:

function fetchInParallel(id, names, res) {
    async.map(names, function(name, callback) {
        commonService.findById(name, id, function (result) {
            callback(null, result);
        });
    }, function (err, results) {
        if (err)
            … // handle error code
        var target = stitch(results); // combine names with results
        res.send(target)
    });
}

edited Feb 26, 2015 at 18:29

answered Feb 26, 2015 at 17:55

Bergi

671k162 gold badges1k silver badges1.5k bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Safi · Accepted Answer · 2015-02-26 17:57:53Z

2

you can use async.map instead of parallel like this;

var fetchInParallel = function (id, res,names) {
    async.map(names,
        function (name,callback) {
            commonService.findById(name, id, function (result) {
                callback(null, result);
            })
        },

        function (err, results) {

        }
    );
}

answered Feb 26, 2015 at 17:57

Safi

1,1327 silver badges9 bronze badges

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Node.js - Using the async lib - async.parallel pass an Array

2 Answers 2

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related