40

Suppose I have a template function:

template<typename T>
T produce_5_function() { return T(5); }

How can I pass this entire template to another template?

If produce_5_function was a functor, there would be no problem:

template<typename T>
struct produce_5_functor {
  T operator()() const { return T(5); }
};
template<template<typename T>class F>
struct client_template {
  int operator()() const { return F<int>()(); }
};
int five = client_template< produce_5_functor >()();

but I want to be able to do this with a raw function template:

template<??? F>
struct client_template {
  int operator()() const { return F<int>(); }
};
int five = client_template< produce_5_function >()();

I suspect the answer is "you cannot do this".

2 Answers 2

25

I suspect the answer is "you cannot do this".

Yes, that is the case, you cannot pass a function template as a template argument. From 14.3.3:

A template-argument for a template template-parameter shall be the name of a class template or an alias template, expressed as id-expression.

The template function needs to be instantiated before you pass it to the other template. One possible solution is to pass a class type that holds a static produce_5_function like so:

template<typename T>
struct Workaround {
  static T produce_5_functor() { return T(5); }
};
template<template<typename>class F>
struct client_template {
  int operator()() const { return F<int>::produce_5_functor(); }
};
int five = client_template<Workaround>()();

Using alias templates, I could get a little closer:

template <typename T>
T produce_5_functor() { return T(5); }

template <typename R>
using prod_func = R();

template<template<typename>class F>
struct client_template {
  int operator()(F<int> f) const { return f(); }
};

int five = client_template<prod_func>()(produce_5_functor);
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Is there a fundamental reason why template template parameters cannot be function templates? Is this likely to be addressed in the future?
@Olumide: Probably because it's a lot of additional complexity and easy to work around (see mfontanini's answer). Same goes for partial specialization, which is used a whole lot more than template template arguments.
6

How about wrapping that function?

template<typename T>
struct produce_5_function_wrapper {
    T operator()() const { return produce_5_function<T>(); }
};

Then you can use the wrapper instead of the function:

int five = client_template< produce_5_function_wrapper >()();

Using the template function alone will not work, there's no such thing as "template template functions".

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.