Skip to content

Fix a possible typo in 1.6.1 #2204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2020
+1 −1
Merged

Fix a possible typo in 1.6.1 #2204

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 1-js/06-advanced-functions/01-recursion/article.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ The new current execution context is on top (and bold), and previous remembered
When we finish the subcall -- it is easy to resume the previous context, because it keeps both variables and the exact place of the code where it stopped.

```smart
Here in the picture we use the word "line", as our example there's only one subcall in line, but generally a single line of code may contain multiple subcalls, like `pow(…) + pow(…) + somethingElse(…)`.
Here in the picture we use the word "line", as in our example there's only one subcall in line, but generally a single line of code may contain multiple subcalls, like `pow(…) + pow(…) + somethingElse(…)`.

So it would be more precise to say that the execution resumes "immediately after the subcall".
```
Expand Down