0

I am working on creating a chroot sandbox and want to avoid the time-consuming and storage-intensive process of copying large directories such as bin, lib, and others.

Is it possible to use symbolic links, hard links, or bind mount to reference these directories from the host system within the chroot environment?

What are the implications or potential issues with each method in terms of:

  1. Performance
  2. Security
  3. Compatibility
  4. Ease of setup

Any insights or best practices on this would be greatly appreciated.

1 Answer 1

1

Is it possible to use symbolic links, hard links, or bind mount to reference these directories from the host system within the chroot environment?

  • symbolic links cannot point outside of the chroot environment, so these are not an option.

  • hard links can only be made to files, not do directories, so these aren't an option if your goal is to expose entire directory trees. Additionally, hardlinks can only point to other files in the same filesystem, which means if your chroot environment is not on the same filesystem as the target files you can't use hardlinks.

That leaves bind mounts, which don't suffer from any of the above problems, and are probably the only reasonable choice.

  • Performance & Security -- I have never performed an analysis of my own, but bind mounts are used extensively across containerization platforms (docker, kubernetes, etc). That suggests they are fine on both fronts.

  • Compatibility -- bind mounts are linux-only. There are no compatibility issues for applications running on Linux; they can't tell whether or not a given access is through a bind mount or a regular mount.

  • Ease of setup -- they're pretty easy, but they do require root permissions to configure, unlike creating symlinks and hard links.


Slightly tangential to your question, you should check out the systemd-nspawn tool, which is a bit like a "super chroot", and has command line options to set up bind mounts for you automatically.

1
  • Thanks a lot for the response. I have been playing with bind mounts and have had limited success. I just asked a follow-up question here. I will look into systemd-nspawn next. Commented May 24, 2024 at 14:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.