Skip to main content

Questions tagged [agglutination]

A morphological derivation process whereby complex words are formed by the stringing together of morphemes.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
144 views

I am under the impression that noun class/gender is always indicated by a fusional morpheme which has some other purpose as well (e.g. gender/case suffixes in IE languages and gender/number prefixes ...
Kiapharattah's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
194 views

I just was thinking about how you might run into problems (in a language like English), where using affixes break down because they are too simplistic (they are used for the common/simple case ...
Lance Pollard's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
132 views

Looking at this long word list and coming from this conlang question, I am wondering how languages which allow for arbitrarily long words (I don't know for sure, but agglutinative languages, or German,...
Lance Pollard's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
187 views

I would like to build a clean "dictionary" (or some sort of "base word form" collection) for various languages. I am used to English, or even Chinese, because it is analytic and ...
Lance Pollard's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
257 views

An example of this letters can be seen in the word וכשלהתמרמרויותינו where the וכש at start mean "and during to" (the entire word means "and during to our grumblings).
tohava's user avatar
  • 163
-1 votes
2 answers
772 views

I am just learning about agglutinative languages so I don't have much experience with them. I am looking at longest words for example words in a language like Finnish, but not sure yet if those would ...
Lance Pollard's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
496 views

When analysing a language, when do we analyse certain morphemes as one word as opposed to multiple, or is this arbitrary? For instance, I could make the claim that (in certain cases) 'a/an' is a ...
AJF's user avatar
  • 173
7 votes
2 answers
1k views

The major agglutinative languages like Turkish and Japanese are also notable for being almost strictly left-branching, much more so than, say, English is right-branching. Is it a coincidence, or is ...
Adam Bittlingmayer's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
521 views

Usually it is assumed that in PIE the verb forms for the singular first, second, and third person are respectively -m-, -s-, -t- (cfr. Latin). The personal pronouns, instead, have the second and ...
geodude's user avatar
  • 261
1 vote
1 answer
282 views

I had always thought that the terms "agglutinative" and "agglutination" referred to the typology of the inflection in a language. But on another question here there seem to be a number of comments ...
hippietrail's user avatar
  • 15.1k
4 votes
2 answers
1k views

I had always thought agglutinative languages were inflected languages where the inflections to a greater degree are built up by multiple affixes, each having an atomic effect. (Unlike the -s on ...
hippietrail's user avatar
  • 15.1k
14 votes
4 answers
9k views

It seems like Indo-European languages are always stuck between throwing away complicated fusional grammar (like English) or retaining most of it (like Russian). Are there any Indo-European languages ...
ithisa's user avatar
  • 423
5 votes
2 answers
909 views

Recently I've begun to wonder how many possible forms can be made from a single Japanese verb. I asked a similar question first on the Japanese Language & Usage site, where I received some ...
hippietrail's user avatar
  • 15.1k
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

Based on numerous sources, it seems clear that Proto-Indo-European was Productively agglutinative with non-root morphemes (and perhaps some specific roots that are also able to act like bound ...
Justin Olbrantz's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
1k views

We've had questions about inflected languages moving towards analytic morphology and about isolating languages moving to agglutinating morphology but we haven't yet investigated the third case. In ...
hippietrail's user avatar
  • 15.1k