974

I am working with images, and I ran into a problem with aspect ratios.

<img src="big_image.jpg" width="900" height="600" alt="" />

As you can see, height and width are already specified. I added a CSS rule for images:

img {
    max-width: 500px;
}

But for big_image.jpg, I receive width=500 and height=600. How do I set images to be re-sized, whilst keeping their aspect ratios.

0

25 Answers 25

1104

img {
  display: block;
  max-width:230px;
  max-height:95px;
  width: auto;
  height: auto;
}
<p>This image is originally 400x400 pixels, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<img width="400" height="400" src="https://i.sstatic.net/aEEkn.png">

This will make image shrink if it's too big for specified area (as downside, it will not enlarge image).

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

20 Comments

Is there a version of this that will enlarge images to fit their container also? I've tried the max-width/max-height as numbers with width/height as auto, but as setec said above, it will not enlarge the image. I've tried using min-width/min-height also. I just can't get the combination right. I simply want that whatever image I have to put into this container, it will display at it's maximum size possible without changing aspect ratio regardless of whether that involves shrinking or growing the image to achieve that.
Seems that display: block is no more needed.
Note that the question was about an <img> that itself includes a width and height and I think that means you need to use !important to circumvent the tag width/height info.
@AlexisWilke CSS rules override html attributes. !important is not needed.
Using it on Chrome, not working for me, even with !important
|
750

Here's a solution:

object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
height: 250px;

You can adjust the width and height to fit your needs, and the object-fit property will do the cropping for you.

More information about the possible values for the object-fit property and a compatibility table are available here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/object-fit

5 Comments

Not viable on SAMSUNG Signage Display WebApps.
You can also use object-fit: contain and specify a width or height!
Note that this is not supported on ie caniuse.com/object-fit
As of now it has 97.96% browser support
Microsoft dropped support for Internet Explorer officially in 2022, and it was unofficially dead long before that. It should not be a part of anyone's consideration for browser support.
308

The solutions below will allow scaling up and scaling down of the image, depending on the parent box width.

All images have a parent container with a fixed width for demonstration purposes only. In production, this will be the width of the parent box.

Best Practice (2018):

This solution tells the browser to render the image with max available width and adjust the height as a percentage of that width.

.parent {
  width: 100px;
}

img {
  display: block;
  width: 100%;
  height: auto;
}
<p>This image is originally 400x400 pixels, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<div class="parent">
  <img width="400" height="400" src="https://place-hold.it/400x400">
</div>

Fancier Solution:

With the fancier solution, you'll be able to crop the image regardless of its size and add a background color to compensate for the cropping.

.parent {
  width: 100px;
}

.container {
  display: block;
  width: 100%;
  height: auto;
  position: relative;
  overflow: hidden;
  padding: 34.37% 0 0 0; /* 34.37% = 100 / (w / h) = 100 / (640 / 220) */
}

.container img {
  display: block;
  max-width: 100%;
  max-height: 100%;
  position: absolute;
  top: 0;
  bottom: 0;
  left: 0;
  right: 0;
}
<p>This image is originally 640x220, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<div class="parent">
  <div class="container">
    <img width="640" height="220" src="https://place-hold.it/640x220">
  </div>
</div>

For the line specifying padding, you need to calculate the aspect ratio of the image, for example:

640px (w) = 100%
220px (h) = ?

640/220 = 2.909
100/2.909 = 34.37%

So, top padding = 34.37%.

16 Comments

I don't get it. I've loaded full HD images with both this and the accepted answer's solution. Is it really being scaled becasue I can't tell (tested on chrome and IE10+)
I love how standardization organizations were in a meeting once and all agreed: this should be the way people are going to achieve the desired result.
2018 solution is bad, when the parent has width/height ratio smaller than the image width/height ratio, the image end up stretched badly.
@izzulmakin How about a codepen so I can see what you're talking about?
That won't make too much sense. It's a 15k lines of code web architecture. The specific code you posted will result in correct scaling for images that have lower aspect ratios than that of their parent container, but will not work if it is vice versa, resulting in stretching. I was specifically looking for a dynamic approach, as prior I do not know DIV size or image dimensions. In the end I solved this by preloading the image, calculating the aspect ratio, comparing it versus the aspect ratio of the area and then apply the proper CSS style.
|
112

Very similar to some answers here, but in my case I had images that sometimes were taller, sometimes larger.

This style worked like a charm to make sure that all images use all available space, keep the ratio and not cuts:

.img {
   object-fit: contain;
   max-width: 100%;
   max-height: 100%;
   width: auto;
   height: auto;
}

5 Comments

object-fit works for me does it work in all browser ?
Is .img a class on the parent or the image? Could you make a jsfiddle with example for both portrait and landscape images?
Upvoted because it's the first to mention object-fit: contain. In my experience, all that's necessary is that plus either a height or width.
@DesignbyAdrian it's in the image <img>
This is great when your width changes like in a responsive grid!
77

The background-size property is ie>=9 only, but if that is fine with you, you can use a div with background-image and set background-size: contain:

div.image{
    background-image: url("your/url/here");
    background-size: contain;
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
    background-position: center;
}

Now you can just set your div size to whatever you want and not only will the image keep its aspect ratio it will also be centralized both vertically and horizontally within the div. Just don't forget to set the sizes on the css since divs don't have the width/height attribute on the tag itself.

This approach is different than setecs answer, using this the image area will be constant and defined by you (leaving empty spaces either horizontally or vertically depending on the div size and image aspect ratio), while setecs answer will get you a box that exactly the size of the scaled image (without empty spaces).

Edit: According to the MDN background-size documentation you can simulate the background-size property in IE8 using a proprietary filter declaration:

Though Internet Explorer 8 doesn't support the background-size property, it is possible to emulate some of its functionality using the non-standard -ms-filter function:

-ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='path_relative_to_the_HTML_file', sizingMethod='scale')";

2 Comments

Great solution, thanks! Also note that you can replace 'contain' by 'cover' if you want to fill the div completely and crop extra pixels that doesn't fit the ratio
While this is a correct answer programmatically, if an image "matters" this way you have no img attributes so you are killing SEO.
34

Firefox 71+ (2019-12-03) and Chrome 79+ (2019-12-10) support internal mapping of the width and height HTML attributes of the IMG element to the new aspect-ratio CSS property.

The calculated aspect ratio is used to reserve space for the image until it is loaded, and as long as the calculated aspect ratio is equal to the actual aspect ratio of the image, page “jump” is prevented after loading the image.

For this to work, one of the two image dimensions must be overridden via CSS to the auto value:

IMG {max-width: 100%; height: auto; }
<img src="example.png" width="1280" height="720" alt="Example" />

In the example, the aspect ratio of 16:9 (1280:720) is maintained even if the image is not yet loaded and the effective image width is less than 1280 as a result of max-width: 100%.

See also the related Firefox bug 392261.

1 Comment

From all noise, this is the correct answer for most of people.
31

Remove the "height" property.

<img src="big_image.jpg" width="900" alt=""/>

By specifying both you are changing the aspect ratio of the image. Just setting one will resize but preserve the aspect ratio.

Optionally, to restrict oversizings:

<img src="big_image.jpg" width="900" alt="" style="max-width:500px; height:auto; max-height:600px;"/>

4 Comments

i can't do it to all images - there are many images already placed in many html files
Ok. try img {max-width:500px; height:auto; max-height:600px;}
Useful information like that comment should be added to your post. That way we can immediately see what you've come up with.
The downside of omitting the height attribute in the img tag is that the browser cannot calculate how much space the image will take up before downloading the image. This make the page slower to render and it can lead to more "jumping".
18

Here is a solution :

img {
   width: 100%;
   height: auto;
   object-fit: cover;
}

This will make sure the image always covers the entire parent (scaling down and up) and keeps the same aspect ratio.

Comments

15

This is mental. Use the scale-down property - it explains itself.

Inline styling:

<img src='/nic-cage.png' style={{ maxWidth: '50%', objectFit: 'scale-down' }} />

This will stop flex from stretching it. In this case, the image would go to 50% of the width of its parent container and the height would scale down to match.

Keep it simple.

Comments

15

Just replace the height attribute by the aspect-ratio attribute.

img {
  max-width: 500px;
  aspect-ratio: 900 / 600;
}
<img src="big_image.png" width="900"/>

The aspect-ratio attribute is not necessary, but prevent image layout shifts.

4 Comments

The height and width attributes are not there only for display purposes but also for performance: they tell the browser what is the size of the original image. I downvoted for this reason: removing one of these attributes shouldn’t be an appropriate solution.
Perfectly accepted by Chrome Lighthouse
@bfontaine if you remove the height attribute, the browser is still able to get the size of the original image, by dividing the width by the aspect-ratio. So, I believe the performance problem is solved by including the "aspect-ratio" attribute as shown in my code snippet.
@DanielBarral 1- there’s no guarantee that the aspect-ratio declared in CSS is the same as the original one. 2- the height/width attribute are parsed by the browser very early when it loads the page, before fetching the image URL. The CSS is loaded/parsed later.
14

Just add this to your css, It will automaticly shrink and expand with keeping the original ratio.

img {
    display: block;
    max-width: 100%;
    max-height: 100%;
    width: auto;
    height: auto;
}

3 Comments

This is the same answer as setec's answer, except using 100% instead of a specific pixel value.
display: block; is unnecessary.
That's perfect and works with images of any size and proportion
9

To maintain a responsive image while still enforcing the image to have a certain aspect ratio you can do the following:

HTML:

<div class="ratio2-1">
   <img src="../image.png" alt="image">
</div>

And SCSS:

.ratio2-1 {
  overflow: hidden;
  position: relative;

  &:before {
    content: '';
    display: block;
    padding-top: 50%; // ratio 2:1
  }

  img {
    position: absolute;
    top: 0;
    left: 0;
    bottom: 0;
    right: 0;
  }
}

This can be used to enforce a certain aspect ratio, regardless of the size of the image that authors upload.

Thanks to @Kseso at http://codepen.io/Kseso/pen/bfdhg. Check this URL for more ratios and a working example.

1 Comment

I like this as it works with circles / border-radius. But unfortunately, it crops the image and doesn't do so well with making a border for the image in the div as far as I've tried.
7

Set the CSS class of your image container tag to image-class:

<div class="image-full"></div>

and add this you your CSS stylesheet.

.image-full {
    background: url(...some image...) no-repeat;
    background-size: cover;
    background-position: center center;
}

Comments

7

I would suggest for a responsive approach the best practice would be using the Viewport units and min/max attributes as follows:

img{
  display: block;
  width: 12vw;
  height:12vw;
  max-width:100%;
  min-width:100px;
  min-height:100px;
  object-fit:contain;
}

Comments

6

To force image that fit in a exact size, you don't need to write too many codes. It's so simple

img{
    width: 200px;
    height: auto;
    object-fit: contain; /* Fit logo in the image size */
        -o-object-fit: contain; /* Fit logo fro opera browser */
    object-position: top; /* Set logo position */
        -o-object-position: top; /* Logo position for opera browser */
    }
<img src="http://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/stackoverflow/company/img/logos/so/so-logo.png" alt="Logo">

Comments

6

https://jsfiddle.net/sot2qgj6/3/

Here is the answer if you want to put image with fixed percentage of width, but not fixed pixel of width.

And this will be useful when dealing with different size of screen.

The tricks are

  1. Using padding-top to set the height from width.
  2. Using position: absolute to put image in the padding space.
  3. Using max-height and max-width to make sure the image will not over the parent element.
  4. using display:block and margin: auto to center the image.

I've also comment most of the tricks inside the fiddle.


I also find some other ways to make this happen. There will be no real image in html, so I personly perfer the top answer when I need "img" element in html.

simple css by using background http://jsfiddle.net/4660s79h/2/

background-image with word on top http://jsfiddle.net/4660s79h/1/

the concept to use position absolute is from here http://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_css_aspect_ratio.asp

1 Comment

This doesn't work if "height and width are already specified" as the original question mentions. There are times when you want to force width and height and then enlarge/shrink image according to the aspect ratio.
6

you can use aspect-ratio property css

.my-image {
 aspect-ratio: 1/1; // square
 aspect-ratio: 16/9; // wide screen 1080p
 aspect-ratio: 4/3;
 aspect-ratio: 2/3;
}

1 Comment

The question is obviously when the aspect-ratio is unknown which is the majority of cases
5

You can use this:

img { 
    width: 500px; 
    height: 600px; 
    object-fit: contain; 
    position: relative; 
    top: 50%; 
    transform: translateY(-50%); 
}

Comments

3

You can create a div like this:

<div class="image" style="background-image:url('/to/your/image')"></div>

And use this css to style it:

height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain; // this can also be cover

4 Comments

This will stretch the div to 100% width of it's parent, but not maintain the aspect ratio of the image.
Did you try it? I got it work jsfiddle.net/zuysj22w. Can you show your case? @DavidBall
This is a similar solution to Hoffmann's answer.
it's ok if you don't want to get your images crawled. Otherwise you will need <img> for clear markup
2

This will make image shrink if it's too big for specified area (as downside, it will not enlarge image).

The solution by setec is fine for "Shrink to Fit" in auto mode. But, to optimally EXPAND to fit in 'auto' mode, you need to first put the received image into a temp id, Check if it can be expanded in height or in width (depending upon its aspect ration v/s the aspect ratio of your display block),

$(".temp_image").attr("src","str.jpg" ).load(function() { 
    // callback to get actual size of received image 

    // define to expand image in Height 
    if(($(".temp_image").height() / $(".temp_image").width()) > display_aspect_ratio ) {
        $(".image").css('height', max_height_of_box);
        $(".image").css('width',' auto');
    } else { 
        // define to expand image in Width
        $(".image").css('width' ,max_width_of_box);
        $(".image").css('height','auto');
    }
    //Finally put the image to Completely Fill the display area while maintaining aspect ratio.
    $(".image").attr("src","str.jpg");
});

This approach is useful when received images are smaller than display box. You must save them on your server in Original Small size rather than their expanded version to fill your Bigger display Box to save on size and bandwidth.

1 Comment

Although the question post didn't spell it out, I think OP strongly implied he/she was looking for a CSS-only solution.
2

You can set the container to display: flex and align-items: center (other align-items values work too). Instead of align-items you can also set align-self on the image itself.

Comments

1

img {
  max-width: 80px; /* Also works with percentage value like 100% */
  height: auto;
}
<p>This image is originally 400x400 pixels, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<img width="400" height="400" src="https://i.sstatic.net/aEEkn.png">

<p>Let's say the author of the HTML deliberately wants
  the height to be half the value of the width,
  this CSS will ignore the HTML author's wishes, which may or may not be what you want:
</p>
<img width="400" height="200" src="https://i.sstatic.net/aEEkn.png">

Comments

1

How about using a pseudo element for vertical alignment? This less code is for a carousel but i guess it works on every fixed size container. It will keep the aspect ratio and insert @gray-dark bars on top/bottom or left/write for the shortest dimension. In the meanwhile the image is centered horizontally by the text-align and vertically by the pseudo element.

    > li {
      float: left;
      overflow: hidden;
      background-color: @gray-dark;
      text-align: center;

      > a img,
      > img {
        display: inline-block;
        max-height: 100%;
        max-width: 100%;
        width: auto;
        height: auto;
        margin: auto;
        text-align: center;
      }

      // Add pseudo element for vertical alignment of inline (img)
      &:before {
        content: "";
        height: 100%;
        display: inline-block;
        vertical-align: middle;
      }
    }

Comments

1

Fullscreen presentation:

img[data-attribute] {height: 100vh;}

Keep in mind that if the view-port height is greater than the image the image will naturally degrade relative to the difference.

Comments

1

You Can use:-

transform: scaleX(1.2);

to change the width without changing height.

And

transform: scaleY(1.2);

to change the height without changing width

You can use this on images and video tags in html and css. This does not change the aspect ration also.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.