Timeline for Could not find a part of the path ... bin\roslyn\csc.exe
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2024 at 16:28 | history | edited | TylerH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed quote formatting from non-quote content.
|
| Jul 12, 2024 at 7:26 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| May 21, 2023 at 7:48 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| Jun 21, 2021 at 13:37 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 16, 2020 at 5:55 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammar fixed
|
| Dec 12, 2019 at 23:23 | comment | added | Jeson Martajaya | if you want to publish MVC project to GoDaddy shared windows hosting, this is the answer. GoDaddy does not run executables like csc.exe | |
| Feb 21, 2019 at 3:59 | comment | added | SarangK |
I only removed <system.codedom> block from production web.config & my application starts running like a charm.
|
|
| Jan 3, 2018 at 10:12 | comment | added | cchamberlain | @Alisson no worries, didn't take anything in a bad way. Difficult to say the exact feature set since it varies across versions of each compiler over time, but yes you will get new language features sooner on Roslyn. I've personally used it to get the ability to write c# 7 syntax in razor views. | |
| Jan 3, 2018 at 10:06 | comment | added | Alisson Reinaldo Silva | @cchamberlain I apologize if I expressed myself in a bad way, I just like to understand the benefits of things, rather than using just for the sake of it. If I understood correctly, if I used c# 7 features, I'd need Roslyn in order to build the project. Is that correct? | |
| Jan 3, 2018 at 7:35 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2018 at 6:26 | comment | added | cchamberlain | @Alisson - Roslyn is the direction things are going in. It contains newer language features, is more performant, cross-platform, and open source. It came out after the other tools - hence future. Nothing says you need to use it, most upgrades incur some cost. See the "Why Roslyn compilation in ASP.NET?" section: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/webdev/2014/05/12/… | |
| Dec 26, 2017 at 2:09 | comment | added | Alisson Reinaldo Silva | @cchamberlain why is it the future? I just think it should be straigthforward to use, but it looks many people are having troubles with it. | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 13:20 | comment | added | phillihp | This worked for me, but only after I replaced all usages of "nameof" and some other C# 6 features. I agree with @cchamberlain that it would be best to keep up, but I don't have much sway on which versions of the .NET framework are available on our web server. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 2:32 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 0:56 | comment | added | cchamberlain | You're advocating against the future. | |
| Apr 11, 2017 at 12:11 | comment | added | Matti Virkkunen | This isn't really a solution if you actually want to use the new compiler and the new features. | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:05 | comment | added | Furkan Gözükara | I have deleted all but still getting that error any idea? | |
| S Jan 5, 2017 at 14:03 | history | suggested | alvarez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected the closing system.codedom tag.
|
| Jan 5, 2017 at 11:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 5, 2017 at 14:03 | |||||
| S Aug 24, 2016 at 18:09 | history | suggested | Javadocs | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed a rogue space in system.codedom (Was system .codedom)
|
| Aug 24, 2016 at 14:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 24, 2016 at 18:09 | |||||
| Jul 30, 2016 at 9:38 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 302 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 22:34 | history | edited | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 22:20 | history | answered | Malik Khalil Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |