Timeline for Why does the p-value increase when I add more observations to my t-test?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 hour ago | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| 1 hour ago | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | @MichaelLew I have updated my answer incorporating your point. | |
| 1 hour ago | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3044 characters in body
|
| 7 hours ago | comment | added | Michael Lew | Does that fact that the experiment appears to have had an optional stopping point have any implications for the interpretation of the outcome(s)? Seems to me that it makes any claim of 'significance' in the Neyman–Pearsonian framework quite problematical, even if the optional stopping point does not affect the evidential meaning of the p-value. | |
| 16 hours ago | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| 19 hours ago | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 193 characters in body
|
| 19 hours ago | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 193 characters in body
|
| 19 hours ago | history | answered | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |