10

I want to use routes, but I always want to use same template & controller. I have routes like this:

**a/:albumid**

and

**i/:imageid**

In the first case I want to load an array of images and add them to a list. In the second case I want to load a single image and add it to a list.

So the difference is only in data loading. What is the most efficient way to do this?

Also is it possible to animate ng-show? Something like jQuery's slideDown?

2 Answers 2

22

Check out this article, it describes a way to do exactly what you want:

http://www.bennadel.com/blog/2420-Mapping-AngularJS-Routes-Onto-URL-Parameters-And-Client-Side-Events.htm

I've used the technique, it works well.

In a nutshell, something like this for routing:

$routeProvider
    .when("/a/:album_id", {
        action: "album.list"
    }).when("/i/:imgid", {
        action: "images.load"
    })

Then in your controller you can access $route.current.action and do the appropriate thing. The trick is to create a function in you controller that does all the work (the article calls it render()) and then call that function when $routeChangeSuccess fires:

$scope.$on(
   "$routeChangeSuccess",
   function( $currentRoute, $previousRoute ){
        // Update the rendering.
        render();
    }
);
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

0

I created a super simple directive to handle this that allows routes to be have more like Rails or Codeigniter routes where the controller method is in the route definition. The method name is set in the routeProvider.when options and the directive is set in the template for the route. See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22714634/250991

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.