Timeline for Can you store a summoning spell in a Glyph of Warding?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yesterday | comment | added | lost-warforged59 | @Someone_Evil Yeah, I realized it got confusing. I probably should've changed the title and maybe not delete the original one. My bad. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Kirt | @Someone_Evil Sorry, I saw Jack as the most recent editor and assumed he had changed the title. To be fair to lost-warforged59, one way the new question is different from the old is that the part of the question I was referring to was eliminated, and it was specifically this part that led to its closure as a dupe. So rather than reposting to get around dupe closure, OP created a new question that was not a dupe, which is good. The confusing part was that they deleted the old question rather than leaving it marked as a dupe and gave the new question the exact same, vague, title. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Someone_Evil♦ | @Kirt Ah, I see. Other than the fact that I made the edit to the title, all seems good. lost-warforged59, for future reference, please don't delete and repost questions to get around question closures. It creates all kinds of confusion and creates an amount of extra work | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Kirt | @Someone_Evil At the time of writing I believed that the comment had been deleted. Since then I learned that the original question including ShadowRanger's comment was deleted by OP, and then this question was created with the same title and similar content. After I left my comment, Jack changed the title of this question. Since I can't leave a comment responding to ShadowRanger on the original, now-deleted, question, this question still seems the best place to do it. | |
| yesterday | vote | accept | lost-warforged59 | ||
| yesterday | history | edited | Jack | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| 2 days ago | history | became hot network question | |||
| 2 days ago | history | edited | Someone_Evil♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Someone_Evil♦ | @Kirt Are you sure that comment was on this question? I ask, since there are (at time of writing) no deleted comments on it. | |
| 2 days ago | answer | added | Nobody the Hobgoblin | timeline score: 3 | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Kirt | @ShadowRanger (responding to since deleted comment) In part, this is not a duplicate because the answer is different. That question was asking 'Can MC generally summon a spell component?' and the answer there is yes. This question was asking whether MC can summon for GoW and the answer is specifically not because the component of GoW is not valid. Justhalf's answer below shows a number of other reasons this question is not a dupe of that one. | |
| 2 days ago | vote | accept | lost-warforged59 | ||
| 2 days ago | |||||
| 2 days ago | vote | accept | lost-warforged59 | ||
| 2 days ago | |||||
| 2 days ago | answer | added | justhalf | timeline score: 11 | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | lost-warforged59 | Thankfully, I can trigger the glyph instead. | |
| 2 days ago | history | edited | lost-warforged59 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 219 characters in body
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | lost-warforged59 | good point. I assumed it wasn't verbal commands. | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | justhalf | How does the familiar issue commands to the undead when it can't speak? | |
| 2 days ago | history | asked | lost-warforged59 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |