Timeline for Policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18 at 14:22 | comment | added | Cerbrus | @MarinNikolli how well-structured AI answers are, is completely irrelevant. The problem is that AI output can not be trusted to be factually correct. | |
| Mar 17 at 23:06 | comment | added | Marin Nikolli | Thanks for the response Ryan. Isn't it infeasible to point out that I should stick to the discussion point made and the question of origin, considering all the responses here? I wanted to reiterate that I understand the business logic behind encouraging activity and engagement on the platform, but I worry that allowing a culture of negativity toward well-structured or AI-assisted answers could harm the community’s ability to share knowledge effectively. One possibility is to force revising, but as I've seen also from my last post, people visit a post, and that's it. | |
| Mar 17 at 21:08 | comment | added | Ryan M Mod | "also test it before you say it's irrelevant" Please re-read both the question you are answering here (which states why testing AI-generated answers is infeasible), and the comment to which you are responding (which does not say anything about relevance). "I had written that it was just the formatting created by it, but the tendency is to use irrelevant arguments for things not related to the content" The problem is that LLMs, when asked to format something, often change its meaning. If you wrote it, then simply post what you wrote, and you'll be fine. | |
| Mar 17 at 17:17 | comment | added | Marin Nikolli | I don't agree, also test it before you say it's irrelevant. It's a closed circle where people who vote don't even test things anymore. I had written that it was just the formatting created by it, but the tendency is to use irrelevant arguments for things not related to the content | |
| Mar 17 at 17:12 | comment | added | user400654 | If you presented your own answer, rather than a guide from chatgpt, yes | |
| Mar 17 at 17:12 | comment | added | Marin Nikolli | Would it have been different if it was part of the answer? | |
| Mar 17 at 17:00 | comment | added | user400654 | If you're referring to your most recent question being closed... that had little to nothing to do with AI... it's not a question... It's an article. There's no question for others to answer. | |
| Mar 17 at 16:57 | history | answered | Marin Nikolli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |