Timeline for Policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 at 15:38 | comment | added | Cerbrus | Well, sure, that as well, but the flood of low quality content is what initially triggered this ban. | |
| Mar 28, 2024 at 14:59 | comment | added | EJoshuaS - Stand with Ukraine | @Cerbrus If LLMs could reliably produce the exact same content as human answerers in every single case, we wouldn't need Stack Overflow at all - you could just consult ChatGPT yourself in every case and get the answers much faster. However, given that LLMs are just synthesizing existing human content, their capacity to generate novel content and new information will necessarily lag behind humans - if no human has written something related to that, they would have no way to know about it. I think that there will always be advantages to human answers, so I agree with the basic point here. | |
| Mar 28, 2024 at 13:14 | history | edited | Heretic Monkey | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
name of the site is two capitalized words
|
| Mar 28, 2024 at 9:23 | comment | added | Cerbrus | If LLM answers were of a quality indistinguishable from human answers, they'd be fine. But they're not, and that is why they're not allowed. Quality has everything to do with this. | |
| Mar 28, 2024 at 8:59 | history | answered | Singularity24601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |