Skip to main content
added 11 characters in body
Source Link
cottontail
  • 25.5k
  • 6
  • 27
  • 56

I feel is the ban is good and should be permanent because we have to remember that ChatGPT is really just a more interactive search engine and its results, whilst clever, are still the result of scraping existing web pages - just like any other search engine.

By allowing ChatGPT answers on SOStack Overflow (and other sites), we'd be creating an echo chamber whereby the answers it generates are simply based on its previous answers, which may not have been right in the first place.

I feel is the ban is good and should be permanent because we have to remember that ChatGPT is really just a more interactive search engine and its results, whilst clever, are still the result of scraping existing web pages - just like any other search engine.

By allowing ChatGPT answers on SO (and other sites) we'd be creating an echo chamber whereby the answers it generates are simply based on its previous answers which may not have been right in the first place.

I feel the ban is good and should be permanent because we have to remember that ChatGPT is really just a more interactive search engine and its results, whilst clever, are still the result of scraping existing web pages - just like any other search engine.

By allowing ChatGPT answers on Stack Overflow (and other sites), we'd be creating an echo chamber whereby the answers it generates are simply based on its previous answers, which may not have been right in the first place.

Source Link

I feel is the ban is good and should be permanent because we have to remember that ChatGPT is really just a more interactive search engine and its results, whilst clever, are still the result of scraping existing web pages - just like any other search engine.

By allowing ChatGPT answers on SO (and other sites) we'd be creating an echo chamber whereby the answers it generates are simply based on its previous answers which may not have been right in the first place.