Timeline for Policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2023 at 17:49 | comment | added | Walt Howard | It's quite simple: If you want ChatGPT, you know where to find it. | |
| Mar 30, 2023 at 0:31 | comment | added | sudo soul | This sounded like a ChatGPT answer!!! | |
| Feb 22, 2023 at 18:33 | comment | added | Ezward | My point is that all of the knowledge is created by people. ChatGPT doesn't create knowledge. SO and ChatGPT are two different ways of accessing that knowledge. They each have a distinct place; we should NOT homogenize them. What we need is knowledgeable people to contribute to SO; turning SO into a static repository of AI answers will discourage that. | |
| Feb 22, 2023 at 6:00 | comment | added | MisterMiyagi | I’m not so sure that it can’t bring new knowledge in the context of SO, or even generally. Such an AI is trained on much larger data set than just SO, and it can at least combine existing information to adjust it to new context (both inter- and extrapolation cover more than the training set). Both of these could add to SO - at least in principle if the output were factually reliable. | |
| Feb 22, 2023 at 1:37 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Broke down the wall of text, etc.
|
| Feb 21, 2023 at 23:50 | history | answered | Ezward | CC BY-SA 4.0 |