Timeline for Policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2023 at 17:09 | history | rollback | Jason C |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Jun 16, 2023 at 16:54 | history | edited | cottontail | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2022 at 15:36 | comment | added | Peter Mortensen | The duplication battle was lost a long time ago. The gamification encourages submitting answers to blatant duplicates, not to find the canonical questions. Search engine output is also broken; on the whole they refuse (for whatever reason) to return the canonical questions from 2008 and 2009. | |
| Dec 27, 2022 at 12:09 | comment | added | E_net4 | "They're effectively just search engines" Minus the fact that search engines would at least provide the source of results and the original nature of the documents indexed, which we do not even have here. And attempts at requesting ChatGPT to provide references for a scientific research subject would often yield made up article titles. In this regard, it is worse than a search engine. | |
| Dec 26, 2022 at 21:11 | history | edited | Jason C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2022 at 19:39 | history | edited | Jason C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2022 at 18:03 | history | edited | Jason C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 609 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2022 at 17:58 | history | answered | Jason C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |