Timeline for Policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

9 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Dec 12, 2022 at 6:56	comment	added	Cerbrus		@MikkoOhtamaa The more you train a model, the more it's output is going to look like each other. More training isn't going to diversify the output.
Dec 6, 2022 at 17:37	comment	added	Mikko Ohtamaa		@Cerbrus - you are correct; this is the situation now. However, it is just a matter of time before ChatGPT gets more variety in its text, or other alternative AI models reach the same level. Unless you count spelling errors of non-English speaking users, it will get harder over time to separate AI-generated low-quality answers from other low-quality answers in medium term future.
Dec 6, 2022 at 17:14	history	edited	blackgreenMod	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 3 characters in body
Dec 5, 2022 at 23:14	comment	added	Cerbrus		"as in the end, low-quality AI answers cannot be distinguished from low-quality answers." That's demonstrably false. Plenty of users have already been suspended for posting CGPT-generated answers. These answers follow patterns that are recognizable.
Dec 5, 2022 at 22:15	history	edited	Mikko Ohtamaa	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 6 characters in body
Dec 5, 2022 at 22:14	comment	added	Dharman Mod		I think Journeyman Geek explained it well on MSE Ban ChatGPT network-wide
Dec 5, 2022 at 22:08	comment	added	BDL		I generally agree. Although it should be considered that these AI tools reduced the effort required to post answers that are low-quality but look OK on the first glance. Most other low quality answers have (in addition to giving wrong answers) also spelling and formatting problems, incoherent writing style and other such things that allow for easy identification.
Dec 5, 2022 at 21:53	history	edited	Heretic Monkey	CC BY-SA 4.0	name of site is two capitalized words. Removed unnecessary Edit text
Dec 5, 2022 at 21:48	history	answered	Mikko Ohtamaa	CC BY-SA 4.0