Skip to main content

Return to Answer

Made punctuation regular.
Source Link
bad_coder
bad_coder
  • 13.2k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 55

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.

A second concern is that we may well start seeing ChatGPT and its descendants generate enough content to start invalidating or at least challenging the "human generated" part of "the vast public corpus of human-generated text" used to train it. By its nature, this sort of tool relies on its own content being a negligible minority of written work to operate, as it does, as a predictor of the next thing a human author would write. There's a nice explanation of how it all works here.

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.

A second concern is that we may well start seeing ChatGPT and its descendants generate enough content to start invalidating or at least challenging the "human generated" part of "the vast public corpus of human-generated text" used to train it. By its nature, this sort of tool relies on its own content being a negligible minority of written work to operate, as it does, as a predictor of the next thing a human author would write. There's a nice explanation of how it all works here

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.

A second concern is that we may well start seeing ChatGPT and its descendants generate enough content to start invalidating or at least challenging the "human generated" part of "the vast public corpus of human-generated text" used to train it. By its nature, this sort of tool relies on its own content being a negligible minority of written work to operate, as it does, as a predictor of the next thing a human author would write. There's a nice explanation of how it all works here.

Added my second concern and a link to information on how it works.
Source Link
Tim D
Tim D
  • 1.8k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.

A second concern is that we may well start seeing ChatGPT and its descendants generate enough content to start invalidating or at least challenging the "human generated" part of "the vast public corpus of human-generated text" used to train it. By its nature, this sort of tool relies on its own content being a negligible minority of written work to operate, as it does, as a predictor of the next thing a human author would write. There's a nice explanation of how it all works here

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.

A second concern is that we may well start seeing ChatGPT and its descendants generate enough content to start invalidating or at least challenging the "human generated" part of "the vast public corpus of human-generated text" used to train it. By its nature, this sort of tool relies on its own content being a negligible minority of written work to operate, as it does, as a predictor of the next thing a human author would write. There's a nice explanation of how it all works here

Source Link
Tim D
Tim D
  • 1.8k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6

One danger of allowing AI-generated answers on a site like this is that it could quickly become a factory for human fact-checking of AI model outputs. I'd much rather see AIs working in service of human judgement and synthesis than the other way around.