Timeline for Parse RNA into codons
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10 at 18:28 | answer | added | 97.100.97.109 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 10 at 7:18 | answer | added | Galen Ivanov | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 10 at 5:45 | answer | added | Random Dude | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 29 at 15:36 | answer | added | Mark | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 6, 2024 at 6:22 | answer | added | l4m2 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 15, 2024 at 11:27 | answer | added | 138 Aspen | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 14, 2024 at 20:05 | answer | added | Xcali | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 14, 2024 at 18:53 | answer | added | pacman256 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 12, 2016 at 20:17 | comment | added | noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ | @DigitalTrauma My analogy would be DNA = github repo online, RNA = downloaded source code, protein chain = after ./.configure, protein folding = compiled program (it's super duper complicated, our computers can't even fold programming) | |
| Jun 12, 2016 at 20:13 | comment | added | noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ | @DigitalTrauma DNA -> RNA -> protein chain -> protein folding -> goes of and does awesome nature | |
| Jun 12, 2016 at 5:11 | comment | added | ApproachingDarknessFish | The Dogma is also horribly wrong when it comes to some types of viruses. | |
| Feb 10, 2016 at 17:58 | vote | accept | Zgarb | ||
| Jan 17, 2016 at 3:51 | answer | added | Luis Mendo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 23:03 | answer | added | Flambino | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 23:03 | answer | added | Benjamin Gruenbaum | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 17:31 | comment | added | Digital Trauma | @Jack hard disk contents are not necessarily dead things either - upgrades, auto updates, etc, though of course not self-healing to the extent I understand DNA to be. But you're right - It is a weak analogy. However I think it got my non-geneticist self a little closer to a layman understanding | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 11:52 | comment | added | nanofarad | What actually occurs in practice if a piece of mRNA terminates before a stop codon (as in the simple example), meaning no stop triplet for a release factor to bind to? | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 10:08 | comment | added | anon | @DigitalTrauma: As a geneticist I need to point out that this analogy is woefully inadequate to describe the reality of how DNA works. DNA is not some dead thing waiting to be transcribed into RNA so it can do something. | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 3:17 | answer | added | TanMath | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 2:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/688192483772084224 | ||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 2:02 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 1:53 | comment | added | Level River St | The Dogma of molecular biology is "DNA makes RNA makes protein." So DNA is fairly rare, and RNA is less famous, but far more common. Protein is most common of all. | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 1:49 | answer | added | nimi | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 1:42 | comment | added | Digital Trauma | The relationship of DNA to RNA to protein was once explained to me in computing terms that I could understand: DNA equates to a program on a hard disk; RNA equates to that program loaded into memory; and protein equates to the output data produced as a result of that program running. | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 1:19 | history | asked | Zgarb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |